Can The Courts Delete Democracy?

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

Our forefathers had the idea of creating a government of, by, and for the people. The crucial tool to make this possible was the vote: The people would have their way, within law, and through their elected representatives.

The idea was rooted in the ancient idea of democracy but with a republican twist—it would not be mob rule.

There would be checks and balances. There would be inviolable rights.

Everyone on the planet Earth at the time said that this would never work—you need a king or a dictator or some other hereditary or ecclesiastical leader. It worked anyway. One hundred years later, the United States—its economy, culture, and freedoms—became the envy of the world.

We’ve drifted far from those ideals, but in 2024, voters on a national level delivered a clear mandate to the incoming Trump administration. It would clean up the vote, control immigration, root out fraud and waste, rebuild the country after five tumultuous years, restore the middle class, and recommit the nation to freedom and the Constitution.

It’s a compelling idea, and majorities agreed.

In the past year, we’ve seen many examples of how appointed federal judges have intervened to try to stop the voters from having their way.

The Supreme Court has had to intervene several times to make a simple point: The president is head of the executive branch.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of permanent administrators.

Somehow, some federal judges have not yet gotten the message.

In the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Judge Brian E. Murphy issued a preliminary injunction on March 16, blocking several crucial changes pushed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to federal vaccine policy.

He did so on behalf of the American Academy of Pediatrics, a pharma-supported organization that advocates for childhood gender transitions and maximum vaccinations.

The ruling targeted Kennedy’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) panel that recommends vaccine schedules. Murphy found that Kennedy likely violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act by firing all prior members (it was a deeply conflicted panel that rubber-stamped new shots) and appointing new ones. The new ACIP revised the childhood schedule.

The judge stayed the new ACIP appointments and halted votes and decisions by the reformed committee, including revisions to the childhood vaccine schedule. The schedule on the CDC site now is reversed by one year. This effectively pauses efforts to overhaul immunization guidance.

So much for democracy. So much for good science. So much for the mandate for change.

Separately, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai ruled from the bench on March 19, in the case State of Oregon et al. v. Kennedy et al. He sided with a coalition of 21 Democratic-led states (including Oregon, California, and New York) challenging a December 2025 declaration by Kennedy.

Kennedy had said that gender-transition medical treatments for minors—such as puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgeries—were “neither safe nor effective” for treating gender dysphoria, did not meet “professionally recognized standards of care,” and “superseded” state or national standards.

Kasubhai vacated the declaration, finding that Kennedy overstepped his authority. The ruling blocked threats to exclude providers from Medicare and Medicaid, protecting access in states where mutilation remains legal.

These rulings make the point. Federal district judges are using procedural and statutory grounds to halt executive-branch initiatives on contested health issues.

In both cases, the judges did not directly rule on the scientific merits of vaccines or gender-affirming care but emphasized acquiescence to the administrative state and not the voters.

Is this judicial overreach? Certainly. The framers of the Constitution did worry that the judiciary would have too much power and did their best to contain it. The Supreme Court is doing the same now. But this still has not stopped rogue judges from generating wild opinions and judgments that seem to have the force of law.

We can speculate that the Department of Justice will appeal whatever the final decisions turn out to be. But that’s a waiting game. Meanwhile, the judges get their way. It would otherwise be quite the step for the administration simply to ignore the courts, as much as we might fantasize that they would.

The rest of us are getting an education in how the real world of government operations really works. The administrative state and its industrial backers are happy to let us have the illusion of democratic power so long as it never impinges on their profits and powers. But the minute it does, the pieces start coming together to build blockades to reform.

Consider the larger picture.

The mandate that Trump had in 2024 was an experiment without precedent. Not since the administrative state was built 100 years ago has any president and his appointees sought dramatic and fundamental change to the conduct of government, of what it consists, and how it is managed.

We aren’t talking small policy changes here and there—we’re talking a serious root canal for the bureaucracy and all its works. That’s never been tried before. It amounts to a hostile takeover of Washington. Is it any wonder that we are seeing dramatic pushback using surreptitious means but sneakily brutal tactics? We might have anticipated as much.

The use of judicial power like this really does represent a last resort of survival for a system that the public despises and Trump swore to upend. It’s not surprising that the goal was not achieved in one year, but not even one term is going to be enough. This effort could take a decade, provided the public has the patience and economic functioning survives.

All legal technicalities aside, never forget the big picture. What the vast majority of Americans want is the original promise of America: a government of the people, a guarantee of rights, a government limited in size, a thriving middle class pursuing happiness, and freedom above all else.

That’s easily said. Getting there—restoring the Founders’ vision—is the challenge of this generation.

No, the district courts cannot delete democracy. Now we await the Supreme Court to make that crystal clear.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 17:00

Ukraine Government Schemed To Funnel War Aid To Biden Campaign

According to a newly declassified intelligence report, U.S. intelligence agencies intercepted communications from Ukrainian government officials back in 2022 discussing a scheme to siphon off hundreds of millions in American taxpayer dollars. The funds, earmarked for clean energy projects in the war-torn country, were allegedly redirected to the United States to benefit Joe Biden’s 2024 reelection campaign and the Democratic National Committee. 

The report, obtained by Just the News, summarizes raw intercepts gathered by U.S. spy agencies in late 2022. Officials familiar with the material say the communications are not believed to be tied to Russian disinformation efforts.

The declassified summary is very specific. 

"The Ukrainian Government and unspecified U.S. Government personnel, through USAID in Kyiv, reportedly developed a plan that would provide hundreds of millions of US taxpayer dollars to fund an infrastructure project for Ukraine that would be used as a cover to send approximately 90% of funds allocated to the DNC to fund Joe Biden's reelection campaign," the document states. 

The mechanics described are textbook money-laundering architecture. "The plan included details of how subcontractors would be funded through U.S. companies so that how the funds were spent and allocated would be difficult to track," the report explains. Two American subcontractors were named in the raw intercepts as conduits for funneling money toward Democratic coffers, though their identities remain redacted in the declassified version.

According to the Council on Foreign Relations, Ukraine became by far the top recipient of U.S. foreign aid after Russia's invasion in February 2022 — the first time a European nation held that distinction since the Marshall Plan. As of December 31, 2025, Congress had made available $188 billion in Ukraine-related spending, with $164 billion flowing from just five pieces of legislation. The last of those bills passed in April 2024 — while Biden was actively campaigning for a second term. 

What makes the alleged scheme particularly audacious is the built-in exit strategy. "They were confident the project would be funded initially, even though at some time in the future the project would be disapproved as unnecessary. At this time, the money would already be allocated and impossible to return or use for a different purpose," the report added. In other words, the design assumed the fraud would eventually be discovered - and didn't care. By then, the money would be gone and untraceable.

The cover-to-transfer pipeline was engineered for maximum opacity. "Additionally, contracts would be executed that would be difficult to verify. In this manner, most of the U.S. funding would be diverted to Joe Biden's election campaign without the ability to track where exactly the funds came from," the report read.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard recently learned of the intercepts and directed USAID officials to search agency records for evidence that the plot was actually carried out and to evaluate whether a criminal referral to the FBI is warranted. Perhaps the most disturbing find so far is that there is no substantive evidence that anyone during the Biden years made a serious effort to investigate what U.S. intelligence had intercepted. Officials reviewing the files noted a lack of investigative curiosity about allegations of foreign election interference.

Since President Trump took office, no new legislation authorizing additional spending for Ukraine has passed Congress. But now we need to find out how much of the funds for Ukraine were diverted to Biden’s campaign or the DNC, and whether the lack of an investigation reflects willful negligence, deliberate burial, or a conspiracy. 

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 16:40

O'Keefe Catches Skid Row Fraudsters Paying Homeless People To Forge Signatures On Ballots

Authored by Debra Heine via American Greatness,

Paid activists in Los Angeles, California, have been caught on hidden camera paying homeless people on skid row to forge signatures of registered voters on ballot initiatives.

O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) released part Two of its undercover investigation into the Democrats’ blatant election fraud operation in L.A. on Tuesday.

President Trump shared the report on Truth Social, commenting “terrible!”

California’s Republican gubernatorial frontrunner Steve Hilton commented on X: “They paid homeless people cash and drugs on Skid Row to forge your signature. Your name. Your vote. Stolen by a crackhead with a clipboard — while Gavin Newsom looked the other way.”

Hilton added: “This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s on tape. And not one Democrat is outraged. That’s because THEY DID IT ON PURPOSE.”

Part One showed petitioners offering cash to homeless people and drug addicts for their signatures. The shocking new video shows the activists, armed with printed lists of voter names and addresses, taking the scheme to another level.

“Fraudulent petitioners on Skid Row are now paying the homeless people to forge names, forge addresses and forge signatures of registered voters,” O’Keefe says at the beginning of Part Two.

Rather than registering the Skid Row denizens to vote, activists gave them $2–$3 in cash to commit forgery and election fraud in what OMG called “a coordinated system.”

O’Keefe stated that the operation was observed on nearly every street corner in downtown Los Angeles.

“The scheme appeared to be present in whatever direction we walked,” he noted.

The goal of the operation, according to OMG, is to “ensure the information matches official records so he signature passes verification.”

The workers handed out post-it notes with the names of a single voter written on them to each of the homeless dupes.

“I’m gonna tell you what to write,” a petitioners told one of the undercover journalists. “Your name’s Robert,” he said.

A petitioner told a female OMG journalist that she could move from corner to corner and get paid $3 a pop for signing other peoples’ names to the ballot petitions.

“Oh, so you guys are all working together?” she asked.

“You ask a lot of questions,” the petitioner replied. “You’re scaring me.”

The undercover journalists were taking a risk by asking questions and clandestinely recording among the unpredictable and potentially violent fraudsters.

At one point, during the investigation, one of the Skid Row workers attacked an OMG producer, punching him in the neck.

O’Keefe and colleague Cam Higby tracked down the addresses of some of the registered voters whose names were being used in the scheme.

In one case, the voter had not lived at the residence for nearly a decade,  but the current owners were still getting her election mail.

“Doesn’t live here . . . I bought this house nearly 9 years ago. The only reason I know that name is because we still get her mail,” the homeowner told Higby.

“I always feel really weird when I get the voting ballot . . . obviously that’s fraudulent,” he added.

After being shown the undercover footage, other residents appeared shocked that their names were used without their consent.

“I hope you put a stop to this soon," a homeowner told O’Keefe and Higby. “I didn’t know they were using my name and address, for political fraud. Hopefully, the governor and district attorney just put a stop to this,” he added.

Multiple California felony statutes appear to have been violated, “including Elections Code §18613 (signing another person’s name to a petition), Penal Code §470 (forgery), and Elections Code §18601–18602 (paying for petition signatures),” OMG pointed out.

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, the other Republican in the gubernatorial race, has meanwhile been investigating a reported discrepancy of 45,000 votes in his county from the November 2025 special election on Proposition 50, the state’s congressional redistricting plan. Attorney General Rob Bonta on Monday filed an emergency writ with the court of appeals to stop the ballots from being counted.

“Why in the world would Rob Bonta want that count stopped unless he was afraid of what that count would uncover?" Bianco asked in a video posted on X.

In a sit down interview with O’Keefe, Hilton said it was vital to stop the money flow to California’s election fraud operations.

“We have to freeze all the money going to any organization doing this,” he said. “The other thing is the entire voting system in California is called into question by this. Because you can’t trust any of it.”

“Prosecutions need to happen, the money flow needs to stop because this is all being funded,” he added. “These people are being paid. Where’s the money coming from?”

In Part One, OMG reported that the Weingart Center, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that offers services to homeless men and women living in LA’s skid row, appeared to be in on the scam.

The nonprofit has reportedly received millions in taxpayer grants since early 2022, including $112 million in 2022 alone and has over $800 million in net assets. Executives “are paid between $400,000 and $600,000 per year, yet the organization has repeatedly missed federal audit deadlines.”

Several petitioners also told OMG they work for Populus Inc., a political consulting firm.

Hilton told O’Keefe that he has put together a team that will weed out the fraud and prosecute the fraudsters in California if he is elected.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 16:20

Trump Delays Iran Attack Deadline By Another Ten Days Summary

• Iran rejects US plan but says diplomacy continues (indirectly, apparently) - White House, Pentagon reviewing options for 'final blow' as Trump tells Iranians 'get serious' about talks. Hegseth: we'll "negotiate through bombs". Trump asserts Iran is begging for a deal. Trump extends energy destruction 'deadline' to 10 days - oil slides & almost immediately rebounds.

• Trump touts "present" of several tankers allowed by Tehran through Strait, while at the same time warning Tehran of 'no turning back' if it doesn't negotiate. Cabinet meeting hails 'successes' while saying war to 'end soon', confirms 15-point plan delivered via Pakistanis.

• Iranian hardliners ramp up call to get nuclear weapons, Reuters reports. Israel says it has killed Alireza Tangsiri, commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps navy.

• Iran "laying Traps" & "building up defenses" on Kharg Island; NYT report says 13 US regional bases largely 'uninhabitable' in wake of Iran ballistic missile retaliation on Gulf.

*  *  * Support us here

TACO Thursday: Trump Issues New 10 Day Timeline

Another walk-back and extension: the earlier five-day deadline for resumption of US attacks on Iranian energy has now been moved to ten days (it was set to expire Fri/Sat). The following was issued by President Trump late Thursday afternoon on Truth Social:

As per Iranian Government request, please let this statement serve to represent that I am pausing the period of Energy Plant destruction by 10 Days to Monday, April 6, 2026, at 8 P.M., Eastern Time. Talks are ongoing and, despite erroneous statements to the contrary by the Fake News Media, and others, they are going very well. 

Now it's ten days... but perhaps this at least means the sides are talking(?!), if not indirectly. Or else this is a move to buy more time to put some kind of ground force component in place. Oil slides - then quickly rebounds - on the headlines, as apparently markets aren't buying it, remaining unchanged:

 

Iran 'Hardliners' Push For Nukes: Reuters

This can't be good for anyone hoping that the escalatory rhetoric being hurled between the waring sides would be dialed down a notch: Reuters is freshly reporting that hardliners inside Iran are calling for leaders to achieve nuclear weapons status in order to stave of ongoing US-Israeli attacks. "The debate among Iranian hardliners over whether Tehran should seek a nuclear bomb in defiance of an escalating U.S.-Israeli attack is getting louder, more public and more insistent, sources in the country say," Reuters write Thursday.

"With the Revolutionary Guards now dominant following the killing of veteran Supreme Leader ‌Ayatollah Ali Khamenei at the start of the war on February 28, hardline views on Iran's nuclear approach are in the ascendant, two senior Iranian sources said," the report adds. 

Coupled with these very alarming nuclear headlines, the Iranians are demanding that the US scale back its demands presented in the 15-point ceasefire plan delivered via Pakistan. As for the nuclear question, many analysts of the 'realist' foreign policy school had long ago predicted precisely that if Iran suffered major attack from the US and Israel, it would then be incentivized to run after a nuke as fast possible. Trump earlier claimed that prior to the June US bombings, Iran was "two to four weeks" from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Currently there are reports that Tehran is being very heavily bombed.

The "final blow" could aim to open a waterway that was open before the war began, or maybe secure uranium that would have been secured under a nuclear agreement—risking US troops in the process.

Or we could just stop the war? pic.twitter.com/N1LWAgNwCn

— Andrew Day (@AKDay89) March 26, 2026

Trump Touts Gift of Several Tankers Allowed by Tehran Through Strait

President Donald reiterated in a televised cabinet meeting on Thursday that Iran had given the US "present" in the form of several boats carrying oil, able to pass through the otherwise closed Strait of Hormuz.

Trump claimed Iran had planned to send over eight large vessels of oil as a show of good faith related to potential peace negotiations. He then described hearing of media headlines which said eight ships were moving through the Strait of Hormuz. He also stated his team is having "very substantial talks" with Tehran to resolve the conflict - but at this point it appears merely indirect via Pakistani mediation. As for the 'gift', some factcheckers have begun investigating the claim:

Tanker tracking data compiled by Bloomberg shows no sign of the eight big boats full of oil that are going right up the middle of the Hormuz strait that President Trump just mentioned in his briefing.

In the meantime oil went to highs of the day after Iran's parliament called to continue the war until the enemy is "definitively forced to regret its actions". Al Jazeera is also citing statements from Iran's military of possessing "one million troops" ready to oppose a potential US invasion.

BREAKING: Trump reveals Iran's gift:

They will let us have 8 boats of oil; they will sail tomorrow. pic.twitter.com/JwriJxAsK9

— Clash Report (@clashreport) March 26, 2026

Trump, Vance, Hegseth Address Cabinet Meeting: Negotiations, Bombs, Nuclear Threat

President Trump in a rambling review of the Iran war situation didn't add too much that's new. He said the US is engaged diplomatically with the Iranians, who are "sick" people who he says were bent on getting a nuclear weapon. At one point Trump stated the Iranians were just "two to four weeks away" from achieving a nuclear weapon, apparently in reference to the June war. Trump says "the conflict with Iran will end soon, it won't be long. Had to take a little detour." He had several times mentioned that Israel was under direct threat, and later said they "would have come after us (America) next." And a new deadline before strike on Iranian energy/power infrastructure starts?

TRUMP ASKED ON NEW IRAN DEADLINE: I'LL ANNOUNCE IT

TRUMP: OIL PRICES, STOCK MARKET DROP HAVEN'T BEEN THAT 'SEVERE'

TRUMP: TAKING CONTROL OF IRAN OIL AN OPTION

TRUMP ON IRAN, HORMUZ: I HAVE A FEELING IT'LL BE CLEANED QUICK

Vice President Vance briefly offered some specifics, in terms of revealing the White House's view of the mission, declaring that the "Iranian conventional military is effectively destroyed" and "this gives the US options". This means, Vance said, that we "have the ability to use every tool in the US' disposal to ensure Iran never has a nuclear weapon." The the meeting, the White House confirmed that it presented a 15-point peace plan to Tehran via Pakistani mediators.

Witkoff: in an address, the Trump envoy declared that "Iran has miscalculated" after the Iranians "repeatedly rebuffed the US' requests in discussions; they have been stalling. No doubt the US is making all possible efforts towards a resolution." Finally, he said we have warned Iran "don't miscalculate again". Witkoff emphasized, "We will see where things lead." Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth later added: "The Department of War will continue negotiating with bombs."

'Diplomacy has Not Stopped' - Iran says while saying No Direct Talks

Iran is confirming that only within the last 24 hours it formally received the US '15-point' plan via Pakistani mediators, but stated its assessment that it is "one-sided and unfair". Iran has also slammed the proposals as 'deceptive'. So in effect little has changed from reports earlier this week.

There is still no arrangement for negotiations, no realistic plan for talks at this moment, state media conveyed further on Thursday. However, there also this from state Tasnim: "Diplomacy has not stopped, if realism prevails within the US, then a way forward could be found." Previously Tehran media stated "An informed source told Tasnim that Iran's response to the 15 articles proposed by the US was officially sent last night through intermediaries." So there's 'hope' for an offramp through what are so far only indirect talks, but then Iran is also vowing to keep fighting, after some reports Tehran leaders are ready for a 'long war':

IRAN REJECTS U.S. PROPOSAL DELIVERED VIA MEDIATOR, VOWS TO CONTINUE FIGHTING

Slight dip in oil on the headlines:

'Final Blow'

President Trump on Thursday is on the one hand calling on Iran "to get serious soon" in negotiations with the US "before it is too late" - while on the other he's said to be mulling plans for a "final blow" in the military campaign. Axios writes that several possibilities are being considered, all which point toward serious escalation and in some cases even ground troops. All but one of the below "final blow" options carry the potential for US to get stuck in Iran for years:

— Seize or blockade Kharg Island (Iran’s main oil export hub).

— Invade/control Larak Island (key to Strait of Hormuz control).

— Take Abu Musa + nearby islands (strategic entrance to the strait).

— Block or seize Iranian oil tankers in the region.

— Launch massive airstrikes on nuclear/energy sites.

— (More extreme) Ground operations inside Iran to secure nuclear material.

Axios elsewhere reminds: "Trump's five-day pause on strikes against Iranian energy infrastructure expires Saturday, and a dramatic military escalation will grow more likely if no progress is made in diplomatic talks, particularly if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed."

Negotiations or 'No Turning Back'

Meanwhile, below are a couple of the latest Iran-related Truth Social posts by President Trump, at a moment Iran has made clear it will reject direct talks until its 'five conditions' are met. Iran has said it won't be "fooled again" and even though Trump has declared 'success' and that Iran has been "militarily obliterated, it's clear that Tehran has serious strategic leverage given its de facto control of the Hormuz Strait.

Trump threatens in all caps that if Iran doesn't relent then there is "no turning back" - however, the WSJ is at the same time reporting Trump has told aides he wants a speedy end to the war.

"President Trump has told associates in recent days that he wants to avoid a protracted war in Iran and that he hopes to bring the conflict to an end in the coming weeks," WSJ writes.

The publication continues, "Nearly one month into the war, the president has privately informed advisers he thinks the conflict is in its final stages, urging them to stick to the four-to-six-week timeline he has outlined publicly, according to people familiar with the matter. White House officials planned a mid-May summit with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Beijing with the expectation that the war would be concluded before the meeting begins, some of the people said."

And then it states the obvious which should have been known before Operation Epic Fury was launched: "The problem is Trump has no easy options for ending the war, and peace negotiations are at a nascent stage." Certainly all of the above-mentioned 'final blow' options all carry extreme risk of quagmire (which might make the Iraq and Afghan wars easy by comparison). Path to offramp or more massive escalation coming?

Iran War: We are not watching a path to peace
Three warning signs now visible:
1. “Talks” without a ceasefire
2. Expansion to economic choke points
3. Quiet preparation for ground forces
This is how limited wars become global disasters pic.twitter.com/GTTOc4o4YB

— Robert A. Pape (@ProfessorPape) March 26, 2026

IRGC Navy Commander Killed, Says Israel

Israel says one of its air strike has killed Alireza Tangsiri, commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps navy, in another reported top-level death. Defense Minister Israel Katz described the strike was carried out on Wednesday night "in a precise … operation" and targeted other "senior officers of the naval command." He played a central role in controlling the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz and recently issued direct warnings to Israel and the United States, including threats to close the waterway; however, just like all Iran's military commanders, he'll likely soon be replaced.

Overnight and in the last 24 hours, Iran has targeted more key refineries in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, which Gulf states have described as a "brutal aggression" against the global economy. Gulf Cooperation Council officials said the situation is an “international responsibility,” warning that “what is a threat today will grow” and stressing that oil supply chains must be protected.

Reminder: Israel keeps an 'assassination list' and has reportedly removed these two men from it, to leave room for negotiations, apparently. Below: Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi

The GCC called for de-escalation, stating their goal is a "diplomatic solution" to end the attacks, at a moment Pakistan, Turkey, and Egypt are said to be seeking mediation to get peace talks off the ground. "Our main message to our partners in the world is to send an international message, a unified message to Iran to stop immediately and unconditionally their attacks against the GCC countries." They added their objective is not to "destroy" Iran but to build a "good relationship," warning that “the deterioration of the situation in the Arab Gulf will be a warning that will exceed the Gulf area.”

Casualties in Iran: Iran's Deputy Health Minister Ali Jafarian said at least 1,937 people have been killed during the war, including 240 women and 212 children. He added that at least 24,800 people have been injured, including around 4,000 women and 1,621 children.

Meanwhile Iran continues to send steady missiles and drones on Israel, with mounting Israeli casualties and much infrastructure, cities, and neighborhoods suffering severe damage.

⚡️ Iranian cluster munition hit in Israel's Kafr Qasim earlier today pic.twitter.com/jEs6fdK8ON

— War Monitor (@WarMonitors) March 26, 2026

'13 US Regional Bases Uninhabitable': NYT

...Something analysts suspected was the case over the course of the last weeks of expanding war: "Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage." This is based on statements by unnamed US defense officials who admit they've had to scramble to find 'alternative' housing and office solutions for personnel.

The revelation comes on the heels of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) having earlier warned that if American troops are 'stationed' in hotels or civilian office complexes, then those hotels and locations effectively become targets.

The Times report suggests that the US saw early fatalities and casualties (CENTCOM figures say 13 dead and some 300 injuries thus far) in part due to lack of preparedness for such a robust Iranian ballistic missile retaliation on US regional bases.

Iran "Laying Traps" & "Building Up Defenses" On Kharg Island

Iranian forces are said to be "laying traps" and "building up defenses" on Kharg Island, in preparation for a possible US ground attack and takeover. Iran has recently bolstered its defenses around Kharg Island, anticipating a possible US move to seize the key oil export hub, CNN reported this week. The island is vital to Iran’s economy, handling roughly 90% of its crude shipments, and has become a focal point in escalating tensions.

There is also growing skepticism among US allies and policymakers about whether capturing the island would achieve its broader objective. Even some Republicans are starting to publicly push back against any possible plans involving ground forces.

*  *  *

More headlines and latest developments:

• Iranian state TV quoted an anonymous official saying Tehran rejected the plan delivered via Pakistan and will “end the war when it decides to do so and when its own conditions are met”.
• Iranian FM: “At present, our policy is the continuation of resistance. We do not intend to negotiate - so far, no negotiations have taken place, and I believe our position is completely principled."
• The White House said the US is "very close to meeting the core objectives in Iran" and warned Donald Trump is prepared to "unleash hell" if Iran does not accept defeat.
• Trump said negotiations are under way and claimed Iran wants "to make a deal so badly” but that "they’re afraid to say it, because they figure they’ll be killed by their own people".
• VP Vance may travel to Pakistan this weekend for potential talks with Iran.
• Iran has threatened to disrupt the Bab el-Mandeb Strait—the vital Red Sea route connecting the Mediterranean with MENA and Asia—if attacks target its territory or islands.
• Iran attacked a power plant in Israel; the state monopoly said there was no infrastructure damage.
• Iran said the US and Israel attacked the vicinity of the Bushehr nuclear plant.
• Media coverage of potential Kharg Island takeover scenarios has intensified in the past 24 hours.
• Iran’s parliament is working on a bill to impose fees on ships in the Strait of Hormuz.
• The Israeli military said it carried out a "wide-scale wave of strikes on Iran" this morning.
• The Telegraph: Russia has begun arming Iran with drones in the first known transfer of lethal munitions from Moscow to Tehran since the war began.
• The United Kingdom is discussing with global partners “a viable plan” to secure maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.

* * * 3 MONTHS OF QUALITY FOOD // USE CODE THANKYOU10 FOR 10% OFF

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 16:20

Iran Earning $139 Million A Day From Oil As Hormuz Crisis Locks Out Rivals

By Charles Kennedy of OilPrice

Iran’s oil exports have not collapsed and are fetching much higher prices than before the war, handing Tehran handsome extra revenues from its crude, which is the only one unimpeded from transiting the Strait of Hormuz.

Unlike all other Gulf producers, Iran is passing its oil through the Strait of Hormuz and its export volumes remain resilient. Steady volumes and higher prices have been bringing millions of dollars of additional oil revenues for the Islamic Republic since the war began, as oil prices jumped and discounts for Iranian barrels significantly narrowed versus Brent.

Iran has likely earned $139 million per day by selling its flagship Iran Light crude so far in March, according to Bloomberg calculations based on export estimates by Tankertrackers.com and prices for Iranian Light.

The estimated daily revenues were nearly $25 million higher compared to the average of $115 million daily proceeds from Iranian Light in February, according to Bloomberg’s calculations.

Iran is benefiting in several ways from the Hormuz crisis.

First, its tankers are transiting the Strait of Hormuz while most other Gulf oil supply is still trapped. Then, the massive supply shock from the Middle East has hiked international crude prices to above $100 per barrel (at about $105 a barrel of Brent early on Thursday), which adds more revenues from oil sales. And last but not least, the huge discount of more than $10 per barrel for Iran’s oil to Brent before the war has now narrowed to just $2.10 per barrel this week.

Iranian oil exports have remained resilient since the U.S. and Israel started bombing Iran and killed the Ayatollah, meaning that the jump in oil prices and the free flow of Iranian oil through the Strait of Hormuz is likely hiking Iran’s oil revenues.

Iranian crude exports remain relatively steady, maritime intelligence firm Windward said on Wednesday.

The U.S. waiver on Iranian sales may not be attracting buyers beyond the already established customers, the Chinese independent refiners, but it surely is driving up the price of Iranian crude to narrowed discounts to Brent.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 15:40

Microsoft Freezes Hiring In Cloud And Sales As Stock Suffers Worst Start To Year On Record

Microsoft shares were trading lower Thursday afternoon, leaving the stock deeper in bear-market territory and down about 24% on the year. Seasonal data suggests it is the worst start to a year for Microsoft on record. 

A new report from The Information says Microsoft executives have instructed managers across major divisions, including Azure cloud and North American sales, to freeze hiring as part of a broader effort to reduce costs and boost margins ahead of the June fiscal year-end. 

Microsoft employees who spoke with the outlet said the hiring freeze is not companywide. They said Copilot and some other AI-related engineering divisions are still hiring, but managers in large cloud and sales organizations were told to halt all new hirings in recent weeks. 

"The company reported slightly decelerating Azure growth in the fourth quarter of last year and said roughly 45% of its Azure revenue backlog, or customer spending commitments, come from one customer, OpenAI," The Information noted.

Microsoft reduced headcount by 15,000 last year. The company ended 2025 with 228,000 full-time employees, the same amount as a year earlier, according to Bloomberg data. Hiring momentum has certainly leveled off after hiring sprees that began in 2016 and accelerated in the early days of Covid.

Another employee who spoke with senior Microsoft executives said headcount will not increase in the coming years, both due to pressures on the software business and the proliferation of AI tools. 

The pattern of behavior across big tech companies pouring tens of billions of dollars into AI infrastructure has been to trim labor costs. Meta, Google, AWS, Atlassian, and ServiceNow have all been cutting, freezing, or reshuffling headcount as AI spending rises.

Layoff tracker Layoffs.fyi shows 71 tech companies have axed nearly 40,500 jobs so far this year. Layoffs are nowhere near the levels seen during the tech job-cut apocalypse between 2Q22 and 2Q23.

"Azure Core no longer has room or approval to continue hiring," Azure Core chief of staff Hilary Macfadden told the outlet. "Until we have credible, executable plans locked to address that [gross margin] gap, pressure will continue to cascade," she said.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 15:20

Coinbase Opposes Stablecoin Compromise In Senate Crypto Bill: Report

Authored by Jesse Coghlan via CoinTelegraph.com,

Crypto exchange Coinbase is reportedly against the latest compromise over stablecoin yields that the Senate is looking to include in its crypto market structure bill.

Coinbase representatives told Senate lawmakers in a meeting on Monday that they had concerns over the language around stablecoin yields in the new compromise version of the bill, Punchbowl News reported Wednesday, citing four people briefed on the exchange.

A proposal that circulated earlier this week would have reportedly prevented third parties, such as exchanges, from paying stablecoin yields, a measure aimed at addressing banks’ concerns over the risk of deposit flight.

Coinbase is one of the largest crypto lobbyists in the US, and its withdrawal of support for the bill in January came just before the Senate Banking Committee indefinitely postponed a markup to advance the legislation.

Republican Senator Thom Tillis and Democratic Senator Angela Alsobrooks are leading the latest effort to advance the bill, and talks are reportedly ongoing. Coinbase did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Senator Alsobrooks, pictured at a banking event in early March, said the compromise bill may leave both crypto and the banks unhappy. Source: American Bankers Association

Yield fight plagues Senate bill

The fight between the crypto and banking lobbies over the Senate’s bill, which aims to outline how regulators should approach crypto, has largely revolved around stablecoin yields.

The White House has hosted at least three meetings for the groups to agree on a compromise, which has yet to materialize.

Banking groups argue that stablecoin yield payments by exchanges are a loophole in the GENIUS Act, which banned stablecoin issuers from paying yield to holders, and present a risk of deposit flight from the banking system.

Stablecoin yields are a major business for crypto exchanges, and the crypto lobby has argued that the risks are overstated and has accused the banks of anticompetitive behavior.

Republicans are pushing to pass the bill ahead of the midterms, where the makeup of Congress could change and derail momentum around the legislation. The House passed its version of the bill, called the CLARITY Act, in July.

Patrick Witt, the executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, posted to X on Wednesday that there was “plenty of uninformed FUD [fear, uncertainty and doubt] circulating on social media this week.”

“It’s all going to work out. Bullish,” he added.

Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis also posted to X on Wednesday that “we can’t wait until 2030 for another chance” to pass the crypto bill. 

“Bipartisan compromise is necessary for the Clarity Act to pass,” she added. “We’re working around the clock to ensure stablecoin rewards are protected and to prevent deposit flight from community banks.”

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 14:45

Wall Street Bonus Pool Hits Record Despite "Domestic And International Upheavals"

As the K-shaped economy rages on, gasoline and diesel prices at the pump spike, and risks of food inflation later this year mount, Wall Street's bonus pool surged to a record in 2025, even as the Trump administration insists the inflationary shock is temporary.

On Thursday, New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli released a new report showing that the Wall Street bonus pool surged to a record $49.2 billion in 2025, up 9% from the previous year, while the average bonus rose 6% to $246,900.

"Wall Street saw strong performance for much of last year, despite all of the ongoing domestic and international upheavals," DiNapoli said.

Bloomberg noted, "The total pool is the largest in records going back to 1987."

DiNapoli continued, "When Wall Street does well, it's good for our state and city budgets, which are reliant on the industry's significant tax contributions."

Wall Street bankers entered 2026 with momentum after generating a record $134 billion in trading revenue last year. 

Top executives expect dealmaking and trading revenue to remain strong this year, but the Trump administration's crusade across the Americas and the Middle East, seen as an effort to pressure China, has heightened geopolitical tensions, sparked market turmoil, stoked inflation fears, and darkened the near-term outlook.

"However, we are seeing slower job growth, and geopolitical conflicts have global repercussions that pose extraordinary risks for the short- and long-term outlook on the financial sector and for broader economic markets," DiNapoli said.

The report showed that the city's securities industry edged down slightly to 198,200 jobs in 2025, from a three-decade high of 201,500 in 2024. The Office of the State Comptroller expects that figure to be revised higher when annual data adjustments are made.

Wall Street accounted for about 19% of New York State's tax revenue between 2024 and 2025. The bonuses are expected to generate $199 million more in state income tax revenue and $91 million more for NYC than in 2024. 

For NYC socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who faces budget woes, it is probably not a smart idea to wage war on capitalism, or more of the industry will leave for red states. 

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 14:25

Putin Issues Some Frank Thoughts On 'Unpredictable' Iran War

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday delivered some rare, wide-ranging and frank commentary on the US-Israeli war against Iran.

He compared the war and the Hormuz Strait closure, and subsequent impact on global energy, to the massive widescale impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. But he also stated that outcomes to the war are at this point too hard to predict.

via ZUMA press

The conflict, Putin explained, is now resulting in significant damage to international logistics, production and supply chains while putting intense pressure on hydrocarbon, metals and fertilizer companies - according to a translation in Reuters.

"The consequences of the conflict in the Middle East are still difficult to accurately predict," Putin said before a conference of business leaders in Moscow. "It seems to me that those who are involved in the conflict cannot predict anything themselves, but for us it is even more difficult," he observed.

"However, there are already estimates that they can be compared with the coronavirus epidemic," Putin said. "Let me remind you that it has dramatically slowed down the development of all regions and continents, without exception."

There are reports circulating that earlier this week Putin highlighted the West's double standard when it comes to Ukraine, in comparison to raging Iran war, which is about to reach its first month.

In refence to the Western allies, Putin stated: "They signed all sorts of letters at the start of the Ukraine conflict. Yet these lovers of the epistolary arts haven't written anything about the current tragic events."

Putin's spokesman has meanwhile on Thursday addressed many of what he called "lies" related to Moscow's role in the Iran war.

"There are so many lies being spread by the media... Do not pay attention to them," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in response to an AFP question on Russia supplying Tehran with drones.

Peskov also took the opportunity to address media claims being made about Moscow's approach to peace talks and Ukraine, in connection to the Iran war. The transcript from the audio exchange is below:

REPORTER: A question about the New York Times editorial published yesterday. You may have seen it. It says Putin was close to reaching a peace agreement with Ukraine back in February, but that the US and Israeli operation against Iran changed everything, and now he’s no longer interested in peace. How would you respond to that?

DMITRY PESKOV: "No, that's completely false and doesn’t reflect reality. It’s true that during the rounds of trilateral talks there was some movement toward a settlement. But the key issues that matter critically to Russia still were not agreed. From the very start, it was clear, and we’ve said this many times, that this includes territorial questions. That's the main issue under discussion. There has stolen been no progress on that. At the same time, that doesn't mean Russia has lost interest in negotiations. On the contrary, we remain open to talks, we're in contact with the Americans, and we expect the next round of negotiations to take place as soon as circumstances allow.

Meanwhile, numerous headlines in Western media have continued to say that Russia has been the real winner as a result of Washington's latest regime change adventure in the Middle East, describing that Putin raking in at least $760m a day amid soaring demand for Russian oil.

This also amid the US sanctions waivers, with The Telegraph reporting that "Kremlin sales from oil and gas will double from about $12bn to nearly $24bn this month as Putin profits from an enormous price surge and Donald Trump’s sanctions waivers, according to the Kyiv School of Economics (KSE) Institute."

* * *

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 13:50

Turkey Dumped 58 Tons Of Gold After Iran War Started, Slamming Price

There has been much speculation about the mystery seller(s) that sent gold sliding into a bear market from its January high: was it a sovereign seeking to plug holes in their budget from the recent surge in oil, a "market maker" trying to spark stop loss liquidations, or just retail investors taking profit after one of the best years in history for the precious metal?

Today we learned the identity of at least one of the sellers: Turkey’s central bank sold and swapped about 60 tons of gold, worth more than $8 billion, or more than 10% of the country's total holdings, in two weeks after the start of the war in Iran, adding to the sharp downward pressure on bullion prices.

Turkish gold reserves showed a decline of 6 tons in the week of March 13 and another 52.4 tons in the week of March 20, marking a sharp drawdown in reserves, according to the latest data published by the central bank. While the composition of the sales is unclear, some of that was sold outright, while the majority was used to secure foreign exchange or liras via swap agreements, according to Bloomberg. It’s not uncommon for central banks to sell spot gold and simultaneously agree to buy it back in the future via swap agreements, effectively a gold-collateralized USD loan, which grants the country cheap dollar funding using the precious metal as collateral.

The move comes amid strains on Turkey’s disinflation strategy - meaning the currency isn’t allowed to depreciate at a rate faster than monthly inflation - which relies heavily on maintaining a stable or steadily depreciating lira, including with hard-currency interventions, usually via state-run banks. Rising energy import costs and increased dollar demand since the conflict began have made that approach more challenging to maintain, and forced Turkey to resort to its hard currency reserves. 

Turkey officials turned to gold sales and gold swap arrangements from the central bank’s $135 billion stockpile to meet liquidity needs and stabilize domestic demand, according to Iris Cibre, the founder of Phoenix Consultancy in Istanbul. She estimated total sales at 58.4 tons, with more than half of that conducted via gold-for-foreign-exchange swaps abroad.

That amount exceeds total outflows from gold-backed exchange-traded funds tracked by Bloomberg, which were about 43 tons over the same two-week period. ETFs are one of the most popular ways for institutional and retail investors to get exposure to gold.

Turkey is especially vulnerable to inflation shocks and balance-of-payment concerns should the war in Iran prolong because it needs to import almost all of its oil and gas. Officials are already struggling to rein in an inflation rate that last registered at 31.5% in February, one of the highest in the world. 

Turkish policymakers have so far responded to the crisis in the Middle East - which has sent oil prices soaring to above $100 a barrel from around $70 - by tightening liquidity, making lira funding costlier, and having state-run lenders intervene in the currency market. 

The sales mark a reversal for Turkey, which has been one of the world’s most aggressive gold buyers over the past decade as it sought to reduce exposure to US dollar-denominated assets. Gold prices have fallen by about 15% this month, with investors taking profits following a strong rally since last year. They extended their drop to more than 3% on Thursday, pushing the price of gold below $4400.

According to Daniel Ghali, a commodity strategist at TD Securities, the economic shock from the war in Iran will likely dent demand for bullion from some central banks while forcing others to sell from gold reserves to meet dollar-denominated obligations.

“Outright sales are not out of the question, although we expect the broader trend to be a step-change lower in the pace of central bank accumulation for the time being,” he said.

Turkey's sales are likely to persist: Bloomberg reported on Tuesday that Turkey’s central bank had been discussing tapping its gold reserves via gold-for-foreign currency swap transactions in the London market, as it seeks to shield the lira from steeper war-related losses. 

Turkey is estimated to hold about $30 billion of those reserves at the Bank of England, which Turkey’s central bank “may decide to use for FX intervention purposes without logistical constraints,” according to a report by JPMorgan Chase & Co. economist Fatih Akcelik on Tuesday.

* * *

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 13:35

Ugly 7Y Auction Has Lowest Bid To Cover Since September, Biggest Tail Since 2024

After two "terrible" coupon auctions earlier this week, moments ago the Treasury concluded the week's final auction when it sold $44 billion in 7 Year paper. It may not have been quite as terrible as the previous two, but it wasn't much stronger either.

Starting at the top, the auction stopped with a high yield of 4.255%, up sharply from 3.790% in February and the highest since Jan 2025. It also tailed the When Issued 4.247% by 0.8bps, the biggest tail since August 2024.

The bid to cover was 2.432, down from 2.498 last month and the lowest since Sept 2025.

Internals were also ugly as Indirects were awarded just 62.56%, down from 63.57% and the lowest since December 2025. And with Directs dipping (but not as much as the 2Y auction earlier this week which saw a collapse) from 26.01% to 25.03%, Dealers rose to 12.41%, the highest since last November.

Overall, this was another very ugly auction and while foreign demand wasn't catastrophic it certainly was on the light side, suggesting that in addition to liquidating other hard assets, foreign buyers are becoming cautious with putting more money to funding the US deficit.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 13:20

"Don't Be Evil": Google's Motto Becomes A Jury Verdict In California

Authored by Jonathan Turley via jonathanturley.org,

Google once had a motto: “Don’t be evil.”

In its reorganization in 2015, the motto was changed to “Do the right thing.”

According to a California jury this week, neither motto stuck.

In a historic verdict against both Google and Meta, a jury found that the companies maliciously designed their social media products to addict children, including the plaintiff, who was known only as Kaley or KGM.

The jury heard testimony of efforts to “target” young users and feed an addiction to social media and YouTube. The jury awarded Kaley $3 million in compensatory damages divided between Meta (70%) and Google (30%). It then awarded another $3 million in punitive damages.

Those damages are nothing to companies worth billions. However, the verdict was like a dinner gong for plaintiffs lawyers. There are already thousands of cases filed against social media companies. That wave is about to become a tsunami. That is particularly the case after companies like TikTok and Snap settled before trial.

In addition to this civil verdict, the New Mexico Attorney General secured a $375 million verdict the same week against Meta under the state’s consumer protection laws.

But it will be a very long time before these companies cut a check. The California case is rife with compelling appellate issues that will take years to work out.

Indeed, what makes this case so intriguing — and even more tempting for plaintiffs’ lawyers — is that it was actually not the strongest case.

The 17-year-old in California started using social media at age 6. Kaley had a troubled childhood with problems at home and bullying at school. She experienced depression, anxiety, and body dysmorphia that could be linked to other aspects of her life. Her use of social media was extreme: all-consuming and all-day.

Meta argued that it does prohibit users under 13 from using any of its platforms. YouTube offers different platforms for children, like YouTube Kids.

However, Kaley created dozens of accounts to drive her “likes” and increase her virtual interactions.

The trial showed how complex such cases are in isolating what was the most substantial factor in Kaley’s harmful childhood. The case stretched the concepts of factual and legal causation to the breaking point.

I have taught torts for over 30 years and, in my view, the causation in this case is dubious. Even with tobacco, there was protracted litigation over other sources of cancer. However, that litigation was relatively straightforward in comparison to cases seeking to assign liability for depression, anxiety, or body dysmorphia. Children are bombarded with social and media imagery and messages from myriad sources. At the same time, many (like Kaley) come from homes with troubling or abusive elements.

The companies have previously asserted immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934. These lawyers found a creative way to evade that immunity by claiming they are challenging the design of “the product” of social media companies, not suing over the specific content that appears on their sites.

That may prove too clever by half for some judges. Product liability law has previously been used to circumvent constitutional or legal barriers, as in the unsuccessful product liability and nuisance cases against gun manufacturers. Section 230 is designed to protect internet companies that serve as platforms for third-party postings. Here, the lawyers are arguing that you have immunity for what is posted, but your system itself is a product that is subject to a lawsuit.

In finding negligence and a failure to warn, the jury clearly agreed with the complaint that the design of the sites was maliciously intended to create “a compulsion to engage with those products nonstop,” feeding  “harmful and depressive content.” However, it is a difficult line between marketing and targeting.

It is not clear what warning these social media companies should offer beyond what they have previously posted. More importantly, it is unclear whether such warnings would have any impact on users.

If Meta warned that social media can be addictive or harmful, would it have deterred Kaley? Her mother already tried to block her from such usage.

There is no question that social media has a hold on children and adults because they like it. It allows them to create, observe, and communicate with an unprecedented range of people and sites. The question is whether this compulsive conduct reflects an intentional effort to addict minors or a product that is irresistible for many.

The only certainty after these verdicts is that there will be more of them. As soon as this verdict was read, the “likes” from plaintiffs’ lawyers flooded in across social media. Those trials will continue despite great uncertainty about the very foundation of any liability.

For now, it will be left to the courts, not these companies, “to do the right thing” on social media liability.

Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the best-selling author of “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.”

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 13:20

Jesse Ventura Claims Trump Staged Assassination Attempt With Wrestling 'Blade Job' On His Own Ear

Authored by Steve Watson via modernity.news,

Jesse Ventura went full conspiracy mode on Piers Morgan’s show, suggesting President  Trump faked the July 13, 2024, assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, complete with a self-inflicted “blade job” cut to his ear for dramatic effect.

The former Minnesota governor and wrestling personality repeatedly questioned the authenticity of the event that left Trump bloodied but defiant, while downplaying the death of Corey Comperatore, the firefighter who was killed shielding his family.

Morgan highlighted Trump’s immediate response: standing up and pumping his fist with the call “fight, fight, fight.”

“Oh yeah, right, right, right. You ever hear of a blade job?” Ventura replied.

Morgan pressed back: “A blade? What, you think it was fake?”

“I don’t know. Where’s his scar today?” Ventura said.

“Somebody died, literally, sitting behind him,” Morgan countered

Ventura continued: “Come on, Piers. You’re gonna tell me this guy’s a big hero now?”

“I thought that day he was, yeah,” Morgan responded.

“Yeah, well, then he accomplished what he wanted out of you guys,” Ventura shot back.

Morgan held firm: “No, I think you can be heroic on one day, and he can be less heroic on others. But if you ask me, was he heroic when he got shot? Yeah.”

The exchange captured Ventura hedging with repeated “I don’t know” disclaimers even as he pushed the theory that Trump orchestrated the shooting purely for sympathy and electoral gain. 

Ventura, who once hosted a conspiracy theory television series, appeared uncomfortable when basic facts about the real bullet wound and the dead father were raised.

This latest outburst echoes earlier attempts to rewrite the Butler rally. In 2024, a simple photo of Trump’s ear without a bandage triggered leftist conspiracy spirals claiming the injury was exaggerated or nonexistent. 

By 2025, CNN’s Touré was openly framing the event as Trump being only “supposedly” shot in the ear, only to face immediate pushback. 

Ventura’s wrestling-inspired “blade job” claim – where performers secretly cut themselves to draw blood – fits the same pattern of denial.

Later in the same interview, the 74-year-old Ventura pivoted to personal bravado, floating a physical showdown with the president. Discussing Trump’s WWE Hall of Fame induction, Ventura declared: “Let’s both get in the ring. He’s in the Hall of Fame, isn’t he? Even though he’s never, ever had a match.” 

He added that if Trump wanted it, they could settle it there, framing it as a clash between a “Vietnam veteran” and a “draft dodger.”

The suggestion drew swift ridicule online, with many noting the absurdity of a man approaching 80 issuing wrestling challenges to the sitting president. Ventura further hinted at broader plans to travel to Washington and go “on the offense,” claiming Minnesota was now “secure,” though he declined to elaborate on specifics.

Ventura has long thrived on provocative theories, but here he faltered when Morgan simply held him to account for the human cost and the visible reality of that day. Insisting Trump hired or staged gunfire toward a crowd – resulting in death and injury – while performing a self-cut for optics remains a grotesque insult to the victims and to basic evidence.

Trump survived through instinct and timing amid clear Secret Service shortcomings that were later scrutinized. His unscripted courage became an iconic moment that resonated with millions and underscored the very real threats from political violence. Attempts to dismiss it as theater, whether from fringe voices or established media skeptics, only highlight the desperation to undermine his presidency.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

*  *  * Top Supplements

Brain Rescue

Mushroom 10x

Ultimate Omega 3

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 12:40

'13 US Bases Uninhabitable': Pentagon Admits Much Of Iran War Overseen By Personnel 'Working Remotely'

The New York Times really buried the lede in a fresh report entitled "Iran’s Attacks Force US Troops to Work Remotely." With the report noting that before the Iran war started the Pentagon had some 40,000 troops in the region, we are told that many have been widely dispersed due to the Iranian retaliatory bombing campaign on the Gulf, even as far as Europe, and must 'work remotely'.

Somehow readers expect they are about to read a story mainly about how troops are now confined to hotels and office spaces throughout the region: "So now much of the land-based military is, in essence, fighting the war while working remotely, with the exception of fighter pilots and crews operating and maintaining warplanes and conducting strikes," NY Times writes.

But then several paragraphs in comes a huge confirmation of what many analysts suspected was the case over the course of the last weeks of expanding war: "Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage." This is based on statements by unnamed US defense officials who admit they've had to scramble to find 'alternative' housing and office solutions for personnel.

Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar, on March 1, 2026. Image via New York Times/Airbus DS)

The revelation comes on the heels of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) having earlier warned that if American troops are 'stationed' in hotels or civilian office complexes, then those hotels and locations effectively become targets.

"We are forced to identify and target the Americans," the IRGC intelligence arm earlier stated, according to state Tasnim. "Therefore, it is better not to shelter them in hotels and to stay away from their locations," the ominous message added, while calling on local Muslims to report on the American "hiding places".

The Times report meanwhile suggests that the US saw earlier fatalities and casualties (CENTCOM figures say 13 dead and some 300 injuries thus far) in part due to lack of preparedness for such a robust Iranian ballistic missile retaliation on US regional bases.

The report goes so far as to say the situation is already worse than that of prior Iraq and Afghan wars in terms of danger to 'front line' bases and exposure to enemy fire:

While Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, for example, were often targeted in suicide bombings and other attacks, neither the Taliban nor Iraqi militias possessed the kind of ballistic missile capability that Iran has.

During the war in Iraq in particular, the United States built up its bases there and in Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Now, the war in Iran has made all of those bases vulnerable — to the point where service members can’t really live or work there for extended periods, military officials said.

As for why this information wasn't disclosed within the first three weeks of war, there have been reports that the Pentagon and Trump administration is downplaying negative developments while boosting only positive stories of battlefield successes.

The public was blocked from an accurate assessment also due to open source satellite image firms agreeing to censor their own data and imaging.

This WaPo story takes on new meaning now that we know 13 U.S. bases “uninhabitable” per NYT.

Satellite imaging firms Planet and Vantor delayed imagery access about 2 weeks ago, so Iran couldn’t do BDAs to improve targeting.

But it also meant U.S. public couldn’t see damage to…

— Rosemary Kelanic (@RKelanic) March 26, 2026

As for running a war over Iran while many CENTCOM units have been forced to relocate, the NYT report cites Pentagon officials who bluntly admit that "The result, according to current and former military officials, is a war that is much harder to prosecute."

This of course is another big hurdle in terms of US grand strategy (assuming there is one in the first place), given already Iran has some major advantages of geography related to long term leverage, which has been obvious given the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 12:20

Gold Vs Bitcoin: Can Either Usurp The Dollar's Reign?

Tonight at 7pm ET, wealth manager Peter Schiff will debate bitcoin investor Mark Moss on the future of hard assets and the global monetary system. 

Since the start of the war in Iran, Bitcoin and gold have reversed roles. While BTC used to trade like a leveraged tech stock, tanking on any shaky geopolitical news, it surged since Trump started bombing. Gold meanwhile, briefly dropped into a technical bear market.

Are traders anticipating a swift end to the war or has there been a structural shift in the assets?

Regime shift really kicking in: gold -13% since start of the Iran war, bitcoin +6% https://t.co/H6AMd039bF pic.twitter.com/5E5C97Cr30

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) March 20, 2026

Still, zooming out, gold had an incredible surge last year and still sits comfortably at around +50% year over year. Bitcoin meanwhile is around -18% yoy at the time of writing.

Monthly trading swings aside, the important question for an investor is which is the superior asset, or even currency. Could either replace the dollar as the global reserve currency? Being backed by gold is arguably what allowed for the U.S. dollar’s global adoption.

Is Bitcoin an improvement on gold given its ease of transaction or is it worthless numbers on a computer?

When you stop measuring Bitcoin in fiat and price it in Gold, the picture clarifies instantly

Every 4 years, BTC revisits the 200 WMA against gold.

Traders wait on the sidelines waiting for confirmation, but for me... a long-term accumulator with a goal of "more bitcoin," it… pic.twitter.com/2Me7cRP0Hd

— Mark Moss (@1MarkMoss) January 25, 2026

Trump has been the most “pro crypto” President thus far, appointing tech billionaire David Sacks as the crypto (and AI) czar. Bitcoin’s institutional adoption has undeniably surged with numerous approved ETFs on the market with reportedly close to $100B AUM allocated. But is mass appeal the same as underlying utility and value?

The biggest mistake I made with Bitcoin when I first learned about it was overestimating the ability of others to understand why it wouldn’t work. The very people foolish enough to buy it thinking it would work will be foolish enough not to sell it as the market proves me right.

— Peter Schiff (@PeterSchiff) November 29, 2025

Tune in tonight at 7pm ET at the top of the ZeroHedge homepage, X feed, or YouTube as the hard money camps duke it out over the future of money. The debate will be hosted by Real Vision’s Ash Bennington, an S-tier moderator and friend of zh.
 

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 11:40

USC Cancels Gubernatorial Debate Due To Absence Of Candidates Of Color

Authored by Jonathan Turley via jonathanturley.org,

The University of Southern California (USC) is under fire after canceling the California gubernatorial debate with less than 24 hours’ notice.  The reason? None of the polling candidates are people of color. It was a crushingly revealing moment in a state where universities have long defied voters who demanded an end to affirmative action in admissions.

USC Dornsife Center for the Political Future and ABC/KABC Los Angeles were scheduled to co-host the debate at Bovard Auditorium on Tuesday evening. Then it was canceled on Monday.

Former Biden Health and Human Services Secretary and California Attorney General Xavier Becerra had sent a letter to President Beong-Soo Kim, alleging “election rigging” and objecting “you disqualified all of the candidates of color from participating.”

For many,  USC succeeded in beclowning itself by first defending USC Professor Christian Grose’s “data-driven” selection process and then abruptly canceling the debate lineup selected through that process. If that seems incomprehensible, welcome to American higher education.

The cancellation is only the latest unexpected turn in the election, where the two top vote-getters will face each other in a runoff election.

California Democrats are in a panic as two Republicans currently top the polling: Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and commentator Steve Hilton.

At the same time, the leading Democrats include controversial candidates such as Rep. Katie Porter and Rep. Eric Swalwell. Porter is best known nationally for spewing profanity and abuse at staff members. Last year, Swalwell was outvoted by Rep. Raul Grijalva, who died in March 2025. However, they are still doing markedly better than Becerra with voters.

USC insisted that it “vigorously defends the independence, objectivity, and integrity of USC Professor Christian Grose, whose data-driven candidate viability formula is based on extensive research and enjoys broad academic support.”

That “data-driven system” produced a lineup of Bianco and Hilton as well as Democrats Tom Steyer, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, former Rep. Katie Porter, and Rep. Eric Swalwell.

Advocates then went into full rage, calling the process racist and rigged. Becerra declared:

“USC goes to great lengths to justify its exclusionary candidate formula. But you can’t escape the detestable outcome: you disqualified all of the candidates of color from participating while you invited a white candidate who has NEVER polled higher than some of the candidates of color, including me.”

However, the methodology considered both polling percentage and fundraising with the polling given greater weight.

Becerra has been shown at 3 percent, notably within the statistical margin of error for most polls.  In other words, he could be closer to zero. (He is shown as tied with Mahan, who Becerra appears to be referencing in his letter as lacking higher polling).

USC then yielded after trying to expand the number of participants to appease objectors. In a statement, USC stated:

“We recognize that concerns about the selection criteria for tomorrow’s gubernatorial debate have created a significant distraction from the issues that matter to voters. Unfortunately, USC and [debate co-sponsor] KABC have not been able to reach an agreement on expanding the number of candidates at tomorrow’s debate. As a result, USC has made the difficult decision to cancel tomorrow’s debate and will look for other opportunities to educate voters on the candidates and issues.”

Becerra took a victory lap: “We fought. We won! … Thank you to everyone who stood up, raised hell and demanded justice. Never give up when you’re fighting for fairness!”

At least Becerra’s position is comprehensible. He has long defended affirmative action in California. Indeed, despite statewide votes against the practice, California universities continue to be accused of applying racial criteria in admissions. Becerra is effectively demanding such action for himself as a “candidate of color.”

USC was left stumbling in search of a place to hide. USC scholars defended the process that USC affectively scuttled:

“All of us expect and welcome critical engagement from inside and outside the academy. What Professor Grose has faced, however, is not substantive or methodological debate. Attacks and insinuations from members of the political classes include completely baseless allegations of election-rigging, inconsistency, bias and data manipulation. These are harmful character assassinations, not substantive debate. They are of a piece with other attempts to strong-arm or malign scholars that have become all too common in America.

Whatever their intent, the effect of these attacks is to diminish academic freedom and chill scholarly willingness to add their voices to the public square. It is imperative that universities defend their faculties’ integrity when it is unfairly attacked.”

That is a powerful statement if one does not then consider that the university caved, cancelled the debate, and meekly said that it will “look for other opportunities to educate voters on the candidates and issues.” The “strong-arming” succeeded.

What is particularly disappointing is that I just spoke at USC and was impressed with the members of the USC community seeking to restore a diversity of viewpoints. The event was sponsored by The Center for the Political Future, which was the sponsor of the debate. It was also organized by the USC Open Dialogue Project and the USC chapter of the Heterodox Academy. Both have written in defense of this process.

Professor Morris Levy with Heterodox wrote: “[USC’s] message is unmistakable: USC was allowing “concerns” and a public “distraction” to override its own institutional conviction that the selection formula was data-driven and backed by research.”

So Heterodox, The Center for the Political Future, and ABC7  issued statements indicating that they were prepared to go forward and also defended the process of selection. That left only USC.

In this controversy, USC succeeded in finding the least defensible ground to make its stand. It denounced the cancel campaign but then effectively yielded to it.

The alternative is to stand by your race-blind, data-driven process and hold the debate for all invited candidates willing to attend.

Where USC was criticized recently for its fake punt in the game with Northwestern, it actually punted in this play and left the field.

Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the best-selling author of “Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution.”

* * * You can support ZeroHedge through a premium subscription or our store. We greatly appreciate it.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 11:20

US Postal Service Plans 8% Fuel Surcharge As Iran War Raises Transport Costs

By Eric Kulisch of FreightWaves,

The U.S. Postal Service is seeking permission to impose a fuel surcharge on parcel products for the first time ever to cover soaring transportation costs for gasoline and diesel fuel, which have jumped more than 30% since the invasion of Iran by the United States and Israel nearly a month ago.

Parcel shipments would be charged an 8% fee, on top of their regular transportation charge, if the fee is approved.

The quasi-private agency on Wednesday sought permission from the Postal Regulatory Commission for a time-limited price adjustment on parcel shipments because of rapidly changing market prices for fuel. It would be the first time in its history that the Postal Service has applied a fuel fee, a common practice with private carriers like DHL, FedEx and UPS. 

The Postal Service also said that the temporary surcharge would help it transition to a permanent mechanism for imposing surcharges on competitive products to support its universal service obligation in a more financially sustainable way.

Last fiscal year, the USPS lost $9 billion, with an operating loss of about $2.7 billion.

The 8% planned price change, which was approved by the Governors of the Postal Service on Tuesday, would affect base postage prices Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, USPS Ground Advantage, and Parcel Select. The price change is scheduled to go into effect on April 26 and remain in place through Jan. 17, 2027. At that time, the Postal Service can determine if a different long-term approach is needed. 

Nearly all USPS delivery vans run on gasoline, which has jumped about $1 in price to nearly $4 per gallon in less than a month. The organization also uses diesel fuel for large trucks that move mail and packages long distances to distribution centers. 

The big parcel carriers have standard fuel surcharge mechanisms that automatically update each week as the price of fuel changes. Instead of constantly adjusting base transportation rates, the carriers use fuel surcharges as a flexible pricing mechanism tied to external fuel indexes. Their fuel surcharges currently range from about 21% to 34% of the base transportation rate, depending on mode and import/export status. 

UPS on March 9 imposed another 1% increase to its fuel surcharge table for domestic shipping. It is the carrier’s third fuel surcharge increase this year.  UPS and FedEx have also introduced temporary fees for shipments between the U.S. and Middle East.

The Postal Service said its fee is less than one-third of what its competitors charge for fuel alone.

“So even with this change, the Postal Service continues to offer great value in shipping with some of the lowest rates in the industrialized world,” the USPS said in a news release. 

The Postal Regulatory Commission will review the proposed price change before it is scheduled to take effect. 

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 10:40

One Day Until Trump's Self‑Imposed 5-Day Deadline On Iran But Markets Appear Increasingly Numb

By Molly Schwartz, Cross Asset Macro Strategist at Rabobank

More persistent inflation

Yesterday, Iran rejected the US-proposed 15-point plan, instead laying out its own conditions in a 5-point plan;

(1) halt the killing of Iranian officials;

(2) means to make sure no other war is wage against it;

(3) reparations for the war;

(4) an end to all hostilities; and

(5) Iran’s “exercise of sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.”

The probability that Washington would accept these terms in exchange for a ceasefire is roughly equal to the likelihood that Tehran would have accepted the original US proposal…zero.

Against that backdrop, the clock on Trump’s self‑imposed five‑day deadline continues to tick down.

The relative calm in markets suggests some investor confidence that hostilities may eventually wind down, however slim that prospect remains. Still, even a “diplomatic” resolution at this stage would carry material costs for both the US and Israel.

We have repeatedly argued that the Iranian regime’s overriding objective is survival; a negotiated outcome that leaves it intact (see Venezuela) in effect constitutes a strategic defeat.

As Michael Every and Ben Picton put it here, “If we see a US and Israeli defeat…Trumpism will suffer both electorally and geopolitically: its grand macro strategy will unravel, to China’s advantage.”

US Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt yesterday announced that JD Vance may be headed for Pakistan on Friday to continue negotiations, but if diplomacy fails, Trump has at least partial backing from NATO.

Mark Rutte said the President was “doing this to make the whole world safe,” and argued that it is “only logical” for European countries to take a couple of weeks to coordinate naval deployments to the Strait of Hormuz following Washington’s request. Not all European leaders are aligned, however, with officials in Germany, Italy, and Spain stressing that “this is not our war.”

Whether Europe views the conflict as its war or not, it is already implicated via the economic channel. Several ECB policymakers spoke yesterday at the ECB and Its Watchers Conference, striking a cautious tone as they assess how large and persistent the inflationary shock from the conflict may be. Kazaks said it remains “unclear” whether rate hikes in April are justified, but warned that risks could intensify if energy prices meaningfully pass through into other components.

Lagarde echoed this data‑dependent stance.

“We will not act before we have sufficient information on the size and persistence of the shock and its propagation,” she said, “but we will not be paralyzed by hesitation: our commitment to delivering 2% inflation over the medium term is unconditional.”

She underlined that April is a “live” meeting. Market pricing of the European OIS curve implies close to 16bp of hikes in April, but nearly 65bp of cumulative hikes by the end of 2026.

Markets, meanwhile, appeared almost numb. Earlier this week, asset prices swung sharply as Washington and Tehran issued conflicting statements on whether negotiations were progressing—or even taking place., with Crude bouncing between $96 and $115.

Yesterday, however, was markedly calmer. US 10‑year Treasury yields traded within their narrowest range since the conflict began, closing around 4.33%, while crude oil settled near $103/bbl.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 10:05

"Historic Injustice": DOJ Settles With Retired Gen. Flynn For Malicious Russiagate Prosecution

Authored by Troy Myers via The Epoch Times,

The Department of Justice (DOJ) and retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, a former national security adviser in President Donald Trump’s first term, reached an undisclosed financial settlement Wednesday, according to court documents.

Flynn sought a $50 million payout from the government for what he claimed were politically motivated actions against him. The settlement brings an end to a years-long dispute that stemmed from false claims of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

Once Flynn has confirmed receipt of the settlement funds, he and the DOJ will file a joint dismissal of the case with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs and fees, the agreement shows.

Flynn’s lawyer provided an emailed statement to The Epoch Times, including a statement from the former Trump adviser as well.

Although the case has reached a settlement, Flynn said, “Nothing can fully compensate for the hell that my family and I have endured over these many years.”

“There should never again be such a brazen attempt to weaponize federal law enforcement against political opponents or innocent citizens,” Flynn said.

“It is not this Department of Justice that created this crisis of politicized justice, but they are doing right by truly pursuing justice now.”

The settlement, while imperfect, Flynn continued, brings an end to a chapter of partisan, ruinous injustice.

Flynn’s lawyer, Jesse Binnall, called him an American hero in the emailed statement.

“In this agreement, the Justice Department is doing more than simply cutting a check, they are admitting that General Flynn was seriously wronged,” Binnall said.

A DOJ spokesperson also provided an emailed statement to The Epoch Times, stating that Wednesday’s settlement is an important step in redressing a “historic injustice,” referring to the allegations of Russia collusion in 2016 and the prosecution of Flynn that resulted.

“Those who instigated the Russia Collusion Hoax and Crossfire Hurricane abused their power to mislead the American people and tarnish the reputations of President Trump and his supporters,” the DOJ’s statement said.

Crossfire Hurricane was the codename of the FBI investigation into the later-discredited claims of ties between Trump and Russia to influence the 2016 election.

Flynn, a former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) under the Obama administration, was investigated by the FBI beginning in August 2016 over alleged ties to Russia. In January 2017, he was interviewed by two FBI agents and asked about a conversation with a Russian official. At first, he denied the conversation, which was not the truth, then said he didn’t remember. Intelligence officials and others later concluded that the conversation did not involve collusion or illegality.

Nevertheless, that exchange became the core of the charge of lying to the FBI brought against Flynn by the late special counsel Robert Mueller, who took over the case in May 2017.

Flynn initially pleaded guilty but then withdrew that plea, claiming he did not intentionally lie and was misled by his attorneys to enter the guilty plea because prosecutors threatened legal action against his son.

Internal emails from Flynn’s first legal team showed this was true—prosecutors informed his legal team that Flynn’s son would be left alone if he signed the guilty plea.

In 2020, then-head of the District of Columbia U.S. Attorney’s Office Timothy Shea concluded that it seemed the FBI’s purpose for interviewing Flynn was to “elicit ... false statements and thereby criminalize Mr. Flynn.”

The DOJ eventually dropped the charge, but the judge overseeing Flynn’s case refused to dismiss it. Trump ultimately pardoned him in 2020.

In 2023, Flynn filed a lawsuit against the DOJ and FBI, accusing prosecutors from Mueller’s office of investigating and prosecuting him for political reasons.

“General Flynn—who already had a reputation as a hands-on disruptor at DIA, who had publicly excoriated the politicization of the intelligence community, and who had made clear his desire to overhaul the national security structure and the ‘interagency process’—was a direct threat, not only to the self-interest of entrenched intelligence bureaucracies and the federal officials involved, but to exposing their prior and ongoing efforts to derail and discredit President Trump,” the suit stated.

Aside from accusations of a malicious, politically motivated prosecution, Flynn’s suit also accused the government of abusing the legal process by coercing him into the guilty plea with threats of prosecution against his son.

“He was falsely branded as a traitor to his country,” according to the lawsuit.

The suit against the government, which included as defendants the FBI, DOJ, Executive Office of the President, Office of Special Counsel, former FBI Director James Comey, Mueller, and others, further claimed Flynn lost tens of millions of dollars as a result of the prosecution.

“[Trump’s] Department of Justice will continue to pursue accountability at all levels for this wrongdoing,” the DOJ’s emailed statement said. “Such weaponization of the federal government must never be allowed to happen again.”

*  *  * Stash one where it matters

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 09:25

Iran "Laying Traps" And "Building Up Defenses" On Kharg Island, Preparing For U.S. Ground Attack

Iran has recently bolstered its defenses around Kharg Island, anticipating a possible US move to seize the key oil export hub, CNN reported this week. The island is vital to Iran’s economy, handling roughly 90% of its crude shipments, and has become a focal point in escalating tensions.

The Trump administration has explored the option of sending US forces to take control of the island as leverage to pressure Iran into reopening the Strait of Hormuz. But military officials caution that such an operation would carry serious risks. Iran has reinforced the island with additional air defense systems, including portable missiles, and has planted mines along likely landing zones.

There is also growing skepticism among US allies and policymakers about whether capturing the island would achieve its broader objective. Even if successful, it may not resolve the wider dispute over energy flows and could instead intensify the conflict. An Israeli source warned that US troops could face attacks from drones and shoulder-fired missiles if they attempt a landing.

“I would be very worried about this,” said retired Adm. James Stavridis. “Iranians are clever and ruthless. They will do everything they can to inflict maximum casualties on US forces both on the ships at sea, and especially once ground troops are anywhere in their sovereign territory.”

CNN writes that Iran has responded with its own warnings. Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said any attempt to occupy Iranian territory would prompt retaliation against critical infrastructure in the region, adding that US troop movements are under close watch.

Despite its relatively small size—about one-third of Manhattan—Kharg Island would require a substantial military operation to capture. US forces in the region include Marine units trained for amphibious assaults, along with airborne troops preparing to deploy. Surveillance has shown newly fortified positions and defensive preparations on the island.

Although earlier US strikes weakened parts of Iran’s defenses, American forces would still face significant threats from missiles and drones launched from the nearby mainland. This has led to internal debate in Washington over whether the potential benefits justify the risks.

Regional allies are urging restraint, warning that a ground assault could result in heavy casualties and trigger wider retaliation across the Gulf. Some analysts suggest that targeting Iran’s oil exports through a naval blockade could be a less risky alternative to putting troops on the ground.

*  *  * Try it for a month. You'll agree.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/26/2026 - 09:05