Zero Hedge

Land In "Data Center Alley" Sets New Price Record 

Land In "Data Center Alley" Sets New Price Record 

Loudoun County, Virginia, known by some as "Data Center Alley," is home to the world's largest concentration of data centers, mostly clustered around Ashburn. Roughly 70% of global internet traffic passes through its fiber backbone at some point, attracting hyperscalers such as Amazon Web Services, Google, Microsoft, and Meta, and making any remaining land zoned for massive data-center development among some of the most valuable real estate on Earth.

Local media outlet Loudon Now has put a price tag on a 97-acre parcel east of Leesburg that sold earlier this month for a whopping $615 million, setting a new per-acre record in the county at over $6 million. 

The seller, JK Land Holdings, had purchased the Twin Creeks site for $57 million four years ago and secured approval for five two-story data centers. The buyer, an affiliate of SDC Capital Partners, recently acquired a separate portion of the property, previously sold to Dominion Energy for $45 million, to build a substation. 

JK Land Holdings manager Chuck Kuhn declined to comment about the transaction but noted, "This transaction brought $4 million of transfer taxes alone into Loudoun County—right this week."

"This one project alone will create between 150 and 200 full-time jobs in the county. It's going to create hundreds of construction jobs for years in the county. … When you think about the construction workers utilizing hotel rooms, restaurants, gas stations, stores, etc., it's really going to be a financial shot in the arm to the county and the town," Kuhn said. 

Kuhn said that limited industrial-zoned parcels in the county and new zoning curbs are fueling record land values, and warned that Loudoun is "getting to the end of data in the county as we know it."

"It's supply and demand. We're getting into very, very limited supply in the Northern Virginia area. You're seeing sizable transactions," he said. "With the new zoning regulations, we're getting to the end of data in Loudoun County as we know it, and it's driving up values. And that's unfortunate to see. I don't think data is right everywhere, but areas away from residential, away from schools, away from parks, certainly areas zoned for heavy industrial and quarry operations can be perfect locations."

Beyond driving up data center-zoned land values across the county, the AI infrastructure boom across the Mid-Atlantic has strained grids, sending electricity prices soaring. 

Years of misguided green energy policies by Democrats led to premature retirements of fossil-fuel plants, stripping grids of much-needed spare capacity. Instead of focusing on producing new stable power generation, Democrats went all-in on unreliable solar and wind.

What's needed now is competent governance and common-sense energy policies after a decade of failed far-left climate crusades that produce nothing but a power bill inflation crisis. Nuclear is a 2030s story.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 18:50

Indigenous People Gone Wild: Protesters Storm Globalist COP30 Climate Summit In Brazil

Indigenous People Gone Wild: Protesters Storm Globalist COP30 Climate Summit In Brazil

TeleSURtv reporter André Vieira captured video showing dozens of what he described as "indigenous people" breaking through barriers and storming the UN's annual global climate summit in Belém, Brazil. The summit brings together globalist world leaders, left-wing climate activists, and "trust-the-science" researchers to discuss climate pledges that they aim to transform into enforceable actions. 

"Indigenous people occupied the #COP30 on the night of this Tuesday to demand that negotiators place them at the center of the debates," Vieira wrote on X, adding, "Nearly 3,000 indigenous people are in Belém to participate in the activities over the coming days." 

Vieira's X post also featured a video of indigenous people storming COP30, the 30th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 

Reuters confirmed the report, saying:

Protestors brandishing batons forced their way into the venue hosting COP30 on Tuesday, where they clashed with security guards at the entrance.

The protestors clashed with security at the entrance to the venue, which was then barricaded with tables. A Reuters witness saw one security guard being rushed away in a wheelchair while clutching his stomach.

Here's more footage:

Beyond the unrest, some in the Western world are waking up to the sad reality that so-called "action" from these climate summits has amounted to little more than economic self-destruction. 

Just look at Germany, whose green transition has paralyzed its industrial base and nuked its car industry, while the U.S. narrowly avoids the same fate due in part to President Trump's 'America First' agenda. 

Meanwhile, China reaps the benefits, expanding coal production and manufacturing dominance as the West, in the name of climate change, pushes ahead with a self-sabotaging green agenda. 

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 18:30

Florida AG Targets JPMorgan Over Trump Debanking, Jack Smith Collusion

Florida AG Targets JPMorgan Over Trump Debanking, Jack Smith Collusion

Authored by Luis Cornelio via Headline USA,

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier launched a state investigation Monday into JP Morgan after the bank abruptly closed the accounts of President Donald Trump’s media company in 2024.

Uthmeier announced the probe in a video statement on X and in a letter to JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon, affirming the financial institution may have violated multiple criminal and civil anti-fraud laws as well as prohibitions against de-banking.

“Rest assured, this office will be investigating to ascertain the nature of these secret and suspicious circumstances,” Uthmeier wrote in the letter, confirming that the Office of Statewide Prosecution and Enforcement Division would handle the matter “immediately.”

The state investigation follows revelations from declassified FBI documents revealing that JP Morgan began scrutinizing Trump Media & Technology Group Corp, a Florida corporation, in 2023.

The timing coincided with subpoenas from then-Special Counsel Jack Smith, who had been directed by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate Trump after the 2020 election.

JPMorgan then reportedly pressed TMTG for transaction details dating back years, raising concerns that the bank’s inquiries were “pretextual,” Uthmeier wrote.

JPMorgan “insisted this fact-gathering was merely ‘due diligence,’” the Florida attorney general added. “These inquiries, however, appear to be pretextual and unrelated to their stated purpose.”

Shortly after TMTG closed a merger in March 2024, JPMorgan terminated the corporation’s bank accounts.

“The timing of this activity and JPMC’s termination of its business relationships with TMTG raise obvious, troubling questions,” Uthmeier stated.

He also ordered JPMorgan to “initiate a litigation hold to preserve all documents and records (in all formats) that may be relevant to this matter.”

Debanking became a common tactic for major financial institutions targeting Republicans, particularly those tied to Trump after the 2020 election.

These actions followed widespread Big Tech censorship, including efforts aimed at shutting down Trump, some of which later resulted in multi-million-dollar settlements.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 18:25

China Bars U.S. Military From Access To Rare Earths, Increasing Risk Of "Derailing" Trade Truce

China Bars U.S. Military From Access To Rare Earths, Increasing Risk Of "Derailing" Trade Truce

China plans to ease exports of rare earths and other restricted materials to the U.S. through a “validated end-user” (VEU) system that would bar firms linked to the U.S. military while fast-tracking approvals for others, according to a new report from the Wall Street Journal.

The VEU would let Xi Jinping honor his pledge to President Trump to facilitate exports while ensuring materials don’t reach military suppliers. If enforced strictly, the system could complicate imports for U.S. automotive and aerospace companies with both civilian and defense contracts. The plan remains subject to change, sources said.

WSJ writes that rare-earth magnets and similar materials are used in both civilian products—like electric vehicles and jets—and military hardware such as fighters and drones. The proposed VEU mirrors the U.S. version, active since 2007, which allows pre-approved firms to import sensitive goods without individual licenses but requires compliance inspections.

Since April, China has limited rare-earth exports to gain leverage in the trade war. After the Oct. 30 Trump–Xi truce, Beijing pledged to issue general licenses to “ease the flow of controlled materials,” though it appears to be maintaining some restrictions.

Beijing has not specified which companies will qualify or how long VEU approvals will last. Under the U.S. model, similar clearances have been revoked—an issue that has unsettled Beijing. As uncertainty persists, many firms continue to seek non-Chinese sources.

U.S. and European companies have reported reduced access to rare-earth magnets; Chinese exports to the U.S. fell 29% in September despite Beijing’s promises to relax curbs.

Elsewhere, Bloomberg noted that while the U.S. may resume receiving rare earths, added limits on military access “may increase the risk of derailing the current ‘trade truce,’” said Vey-Sern Ling, senior equity adviser at Union Bancaire Privée.

Recall just days ago we noted that China's deal with the U.S. on rare earths may have "hit a snag", writing that China was developing a new rare earth licensing system that could speed up exports, though it’s unlikely to fully reverse restrictions as hoped by Washington, according to industry sources cited by Reuters

Reuters wrote last week that the new regime would simplify approvals compared to the rules introduced in April and expanded in October, which require a license for each shipment and have caused significant delays and shortages. Beijing’s curbs—covering over 90% of the world’s processed rare earths and magnets—have become a key point of leverage in its trade dispute with Washington.

Despite a recent U.S.-China agreement pausing some restrictions for a year, insiders say broader export controls remain in place. General licenses are expected to be harder to obtain for buyers linked to defense or sensitive sectors. Since April, EU firms have filed roughly 2,000 applications, with just over half approved.

We had speculated about how close the deal could be to collapse as recently as last week, and we said that it felt like "'the cracks in this latest trade deal are already starting to show..."

We concluded that "the game of export whack-a-mole in the second World Trade War continues: today the US is getting rare earths (at least until Trump has another Truth Social meltdown), but just got stopped out on other, just as important materials. This export control rotation will continue until the day the US is self-sufficient, which however due to the abovementioned environmental limitations, will take a very long time..."

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 18:00

How AI Is Supercharging Scientific Fraud

How AI Is Supercharging Scientific Fraud

Authored by Autumn Spredemann via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Academics and cybersecurity professionals warn that a wave of fake scientific research created with artificial intelligence (AI) is quietly slipping past plagiarism checks and into the scholarly record. This phenomenon puts the future credibility of scientific research at risk by amplifying the long-running industry of “paper-mill” fraud, experts say.

Illustration by The Epoch Times, Shutterstock

Academic paper mills—fake organizations that profit from falsified studies and authorship—have plagued scholars for years and AI is now acting as a force multiplier.

Some experts believe structural changes are needed, not just better plagiarism checkers, to solve the problem.

The scope of the problem is staggering, with more than 10,000 research papers retracted globally in 2023, according to Nature Portfolio.

Manuscripts fabricated using large language models (LLMs) are proliferating across multiple academic disciplines and platforms, including Google Scholar, the University of Borås found. A recent analysis published in Nature Portfolio observed that LLM tools including ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude can generate plausible research that passes standard plagiarism checks.

In May, Diomidis Spinellis, a computer science academic and professor at the Athens University of Economics and Business, published an independent study of AI-generated content found in the Global International Journal of Innovative Research after discovering his name had been used in a false attribution.

Spinellis noted that just five of the 53 articles examined with the fewest in-text citations showed signs of human involvement. AI detection scores confirmed “high probabilities” of AI-created content in the remaining 48.

The ChatGPT app and website are displayed on a phone and a laptop in an illustration photo from 2025. Academics and cybersecurity experts warn that AI-generated fake research is slipping past plagiarism checks and entering the scholarly record, threatening the credibility of scientific work. Justin Tallis/AFP via Getty Images

In an analysis of AI-generated “junk” science published on Google Scholar, Swedish university researchers identified more than 100 suspected AI-generated articles.

Google did not respond to The Epoch Times’ request for comment.

The Swedish study authors said a key concern with AI-created research—human-assisted or otherwise—is that misinformation could be used for “strategic manipulation.”

“The risk of what we call ‘evidence hacking’ increases significantly when AI-generated research is spread in search engines. This can have tangible consequences as incorrect results can seep further into society and possibly also into more and more domains,” study author Björn Ekström said.

Moreover, the Swedish university team believes that even if the articles are withdrawn, AI papers create a burden for the already hard-pressed peer review system.

Far-Reaching Consequences

“The most damaging impact of a flood of AI-generated junk science will be on research areas that concern people,” Nishanshi Shukla, an AI ethicist at Western Governors University, told The Epoch Times.

Shukla said that when AI is used to analyze data, human oversight and analysis are critical.

When the entirety of research is generated by AI, there is a risk of homogenization of knowledge,” she said.

“In [the] near term, this means that all research [that] follows similar paths and methods is corrupted by similar assumptions and biases, and caters to only certain groups of people,” she said. “In the long term, this means that there is no new knowledge, and knowledge production is a cyclic process devoid of human critical thinking.”

A person views an example of a “deepfake” video manipulated using artificial intelligence, by Carnegie Mellon University researchers, in Washington on Jan. 25, 2019. A key concern with AI-created research—human-assisted or otherwise—is that misinformation could be used for “strategic manipulation,” researchers said. Alexandra Robinson/AFP via Getty Images

Michal Prywata, co-founder of AI research company Vertus, agrees that the AI fake science trend is problematic—and the effects are already visible.

What we’re essentially seeing right now is the equivalent of a denial-of-service attack. Real researchers drowning in noise, peer reviewers are overwhelmed, and citations are being polluted with fabricated references. It’s making true scientific progress harder to identify and validate,” Prywata told The Epoch Times.

In his work with frontier AI systems, Prywata has seen the byproducts of mass-deployed LLMs up close, which he believes is at the heart of the issue.

“This is the predictable consequence of treating AI as a productivity tool rather than understanding what intelligence really is,” he said.“LLMs, as they are now, are not built like minds. These are sophisticated pattern-matching systems that are incredibly good at producing plausible-sounding text, and that’s exactly what fake research needs to look credible.”

Chief information security officer at Optiv, Nathan Wenzler, believes the future of public trust is at stake.

As more incorrect or outright false AI-generated content is added into respectable journals and key scientific reviews, the near and long-term effects are the same: an erosion of trust,” Wenzler told The Epoch Times.

From the security end, Wenzler said universities now face a different kind of threat when it comes to the theft of intellectual property.

“We’ve seen cyberattacks from nation-state actors that specifically target the theft of research from universities and research institutes, and these same nation-states turn around and release the findings from their own universities as if they had performed the research themselves,” he said.

Ultimately, Wenzler said this stands to have a huge financial impact on the organizations counting on grants to advance legitimate scientific studies, technology, health care, and more.

Research scientists develop a replicating RNA vaccine at a microbiology lab at the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle on Dec. 10, 2020. Experts warn that universities now face heightened risks of intellectual property theft from AI-augmented nation-state cyberattacks. Karen Ducey/Getty Images

Wenzler described a possible real-world example: “AI could easily be used to augment these cyberattacks, modify the content of the stolen research just enough to create the illusion that it is unique and separate content, or create a false narrative that existing research is flawed by creating fake counterpoint data to undermine the credibility of the original data and findings.

The potential financial impact is massive, but the way it could impact advancements that benefit people across the globe is immeasurable,” he said.

Prywata pointed out that a large segment of the public already questions academia.

“What scares me is that this will accelerate people questioning scientific institutions,” he said. “People now have evidence that the system can be gamed at scale. I’d say that’s dangerous for society.”

The stream of fake AI-generated research papers is happening at a time when public trust in science remains lower than before the COVID-19 pandemic. A 2024 Pew Research Center analysis found just 26 percent of respondents have a great deal of confidence in scientists to act in the best interests of the public. Fifty-one percent stated they have a fair amount of confidence; by contrast, the number of respondents who expressed the same level of confidence in science in 2020 was 87 percent.

At the same time, Americans have grown distrustful of advancements in AI. A recent Brookings Institution study found that participants exposed to information about AI advancements became distrustful across different metrics, including linguistics, medicine, and dating, when compared to non-AI advancements in the same areas.

Read the rest here...

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 17:40

Rare 'Cannibal CME' Set To Slam Earth, Raising Risk Of Ground-Level Radiation Surge, Threats To Critical Infrastructure

Rare 'Cannibal CME' Set To Slam Earth, Raising Risk Of Ground-Level Radiation Surge, Threats To Critical Infrastructure

Three coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that erupted from the sun in recent days are expected to merge into a powerful "cannibal CME" and smash into the Earth's atmosphere on Wednesday, triggering intense geomagnetic activity that could make the northern lights visible across much of the United States.

"As many as three CMEs are approaching Earth, including today's fast-moving X5-class CME from sunspot 4274," SpaceWeatherNews wrote in a report on its website. 

The website that tracks solar flares continued, "There is a chance that the three CMEs will merge into a single 'Cannibal CME,' a potent type of storm cloud that could cause a severe G4-class geomagnetic storm when it arrives on Nov. 12."

Via SolarHam data. 

SpaceWeatherNews said if the geomagnetic storm develops, northern lights would descend to mid-latitudes and become visible in more than half of the Lower 48.

Now this is very alarming. The report continued:

A 'GROUND LEVEL EVENT' IS UNDERWAY: Today's X5-class solar flare from sunspot 4274 hurled a fuisillade of energetic protons toward Earth. Some of the particles are so powerful, they are penetrating the atmosphere all the way to the ground. "This is a very significant event," says Professor Clive Dyer of the Surrey Space Centre. "Neutron monitors around the world are detecting it."

This is called a Ground Level Event (GLE). GLEs of this magnitude are rare; they happen only once or twice every solar cycle. "This one is comparable to the GLE of Dec. 13, 2006," says Dyer. That makes it a ~20-year event.

For comparison, during the 2006 GLE, passengers on high-latitude air flights experienced a peak dose rate of 25-30 microSieverts per hour at cruising altitude. This translated to an estimated 20% increase in the total effective radiation dose. Something similar may be happening now.

"This is a very significant event and analysis will help us prepare for larger events such as a repeat of Feb. 23 1956, which is soon to have its 70th anniversary and gave a thousandfold increase in radiation at 40000 feet," says Dyer.

NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center ranks the incoming solar event a 4 out of 5 on NOAA's space weather scale, meaning it's classified as "Severe."

SWPC warned, "Detrimental impacts to some of our critical infrastructure technology are possible, but mitigation is possible." 

Carrington-class storm would be absolutely catastrophic for power grids and the AI infrastructure being installed at lightning pace. And there are others

... Which US power grid is most at risk? Find out here.

Also, Solar Cycle 25 has peaked (more here). 

Triple Solar Storm Alert - X5 Solar Flare/BIG CME

Will Starlink's satellite internet service experience disruptions tomorrow?

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 17:20

New Alliance, Old Scandal: The COVID Failure Haunting Hochul

New Alliance, Old Scandal: The COVID Failure Haunting Hochul

Authored by J.T. Young via RealClearPolitics,

Recently Gov. Kathy Hochul announced that New York was joining 14 other states in a “nonpartisan initiative” (though all 15 states have Democratic governors) called the Governors Public Health Alliance, a “coordinating hub for governors and their public health leaders and a unified, cross-state liaison with the global health community. The Alliance also provides a platform for governors to exchange best practices, align policies, and coordinate on issues like vaccine access, emergency response and health security.” 

Despite claiming the GPHA is “nonpartisan,” Hochul’s press release is anything but: “From undermining vaccine access and abortion rights to slashing billions in Medicaid funding from those in need, the federal government is wreaking havoc on public health and the institutions we rely on.” 

Hochul’s announcement also states: “This new Alliance builds on New York’s ongoing work to protect access to public health and scientific information amidst ongoing attacks from the federal government.” 

Finally, the press release burnishes GPHA’s credentials by stating: “The Alliance is advised by leading public health experts, including former CDC Director Dr. Mandy Cohen,” as well as others. 

All these platitudes of partisanship and self-promotion are par-for-the-course for a governor seeking reelection. However, for New York in general, and Hochul in particular, they are the height of hypocrisy. 

By harping on being above politics, adhering to best health care practices, promoting vaccines, protecting public health, relying on scientific information, and following CDC expertise, Hochul’s announcement resurrects the ignominious role New York played during the pandemic: specifically, the Cuomo-Hochul administration’s decision to admit potentially COVID-positive patients into the state’s nursing homes – among the worst decisions made by any state during the pandemic. 

In doing what it unconscionably did, the Cuomo-Hochul administration violated everything its press release on the GPHA is now touting. It did so in March 2020. Over the following months, it sought to cover up the number of deaths its horrendous policy caused. Then after Hochul became governor, following Cuomo’s resignation in disgrace (and looming conviction on sexual harassment), the Hochul administration stonewalled an investigation by the U.S. House of Representatives’ Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic – doing so for months. Even after the Hochul administration delivered documents, it used every means to ensure it failed to deliver the real information the subcommittee sought. 

For those who may have forgotten exactly how bad New York’s actions were regarding nursing homes during the pandemic, the Select Subcommittee summed it up in its Dec. 2, 2024, final report: “Age and comorbidities were the most important risk factor for predicting hospitalization and death from COVID-19. This fact was known by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the earliest days of the pandemic. Despite knowing the threat COVID-19 posed to the elderly, the Cuomo administration issued the March 25 directive that ordered potentially COVID-positive nursing home residents be admitted or readmitted to a nursing home and prohibited testing.”

Sadly, the predictable results from such a disastrous policy occurred: Well over 15,000 nursing home patients died in and out facilities. Of course, the Cuomo administration attempted to count far fewer. The Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity found “A comprehensive new analysis indicates that the Cuomo administration undercounted nursing home deaths by 68%.”

The FREOPP report stated: “While New York was not counting the number of long-term care residents who died of COVID-19 in hospitals, the state appeared to be outperforming other states along the Acela Corridor. But after accounting for such residents who died in hospitals, New York experienced nursing home and assisted living fatalities comparable to states such as Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, who were among the hardest hit. This is in part due to policy decisions by those states that discharged seniors with active COVID-19 infections from hospitals to LTC facilities.” 

Amazingly, Cuomo was touting New York’s low death rate in its nursing homes: “You look at the nursing home deaths in this state,” Cuomo said. “Do you know what number we are by percentage before you made that statement? We’re No. 46 out of 50 states, and we had the worst problem, and we’re 46th in terms of percentage of deaths in nursing homes.”

Bad as cause and outcome were, the Cuomo-Hochul administration compounded it, trying to hide the excessive deaths by fudging the numbers. Said the Select Committee report: “The Cuomo Administration sought to cover-up the impact of the March 25 Directive by continually altering the methodology of how nursing home fatalities were counted and by repeatedly asserting the March 25 Directive followed federal guidance …” Needless to say, the March 25 directive did not follow either CMS or CDC guidance. 

Apologists wishing to sweep these actions to the past or to Cuomo alone should be aware that the story did not stop there. 

After Hochul became governor following Cuomo’s August 2021 resignation, her administration was repeatedly asked for information regarding the March 25 Directive and its “cover-up.” According to the Select Subcommittee report, “Kathy Hochul promised to be ‘fully transparent’ regarding COVID-19 in nursing homes.”

In understatement, the Select Subcommittee’s report stated that Hochul’s administration “was not fully transparent regarding the former-Cuomo Administration’s failures.” Instead, it took three letters, eight months, and a subpoena before any information was delivered. Even then, the documents were “incomplete and substantially redacted – often, without apparent legal basis. Further, there are responsive documents the Select Subcommittee knows exist – through public reporting and witness testimony – that were not included…”

Hochul’s role in the initial New York nursing home directive and “cover-up” is unknown. Perhaps without the “substantial” redactions and with the “withheld thousands of pages of responsive documents pursuant to tenuous legal privileges,” things would be more clear. But her role since taking office is quite clear: to bury the past.

All of this is supremely hypocritical now that Hochul is using COVID, vaccines, and following federal guidance in her announcement for a transparently political stunt. For five years, two New York administrations have tried to hide what occurred in that state’s nursing homes – one of the pandemic’s worst scandals. And as a capper, “two other states … had orders similar to New York’s March 25 Directive.” Those states were New Jersey and Pennsylvania; both are also in the new GPHA. 

In their haste to play politics, these governors should have taken a closer look at history – their own pandemic histories. Gov. Hochul should also be hoping New York voters do not take close look at a scandal that has still not been fully revealed.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 17:00

US Mulls Major New Base Near Gaza For 'Stabilization Operations'

US Mulls Major New Base Near Gaza For 'Stabilization Operations'

The United States is reportedly planning to establish a major military base near Israel's border with Gaza, Israeli sources as well as Bloomberg are reporting.

Israeli officials familiar with initial discussions said the facility would serve international forces stationed in Gaza to help uphold the current Trump-brokered ceasefire and could accommodate several thousand troops. The site would be big enough to host a significant American military presence and support future international stabilization operations, and would be a significant extension of Civil-Military Coordination Center (CMCC) in Kiryat Gat.

Via Associated Press

But unlike the current coordination center, this would support many thousands of international forces and not just the few hundred staffing the CMCC currently.

The proposed base would have the aim of strengthening American influence on the ground, allowing Washington to manage developments in Gaza more independently, the Israeli reports say.

However, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have not acknowledged any such planning, suggesting these ideas are just at the conception phase, amid speculative reports.

Bloomberg says it would host 10,000 people and would be established "near Gaza", while Responsible Statecraft says it would be a half-billion dollar endeavor:

The proposed base, which would reportedly cost $500 million and be capable of housing thousands of U.S. troops, would dramatically expand the American military’s presence in Israel. The plan also bolsters speculation that the Trump administration hopes to play a hands-on role in the stabilization and reconstruction of Gaza following reports about Washington’s growing contributions to aid provision and even housing development in the war-torn region.

The local Palestinian population would without doubt see this as another act of US hegemony in the Middle East, and as a way the bolster Israel's occupation of Palestinian lands. They would also be wary of Trump's so-called Gaza Riviera plans floated early in the administration.

Annelle Sheline of the Quincy Institute has weighed in following the reports, point out that "Trump ran successfully on ending the forever wars in the Middle East."

Stark images of Gaza lying in rubble after two years of Hamas-Israel war...

However, "Building a U.S. military base in historic Palestine is antithetical to the America First foreign policy he was elected to implement," Sheline said. She noted too this could endanger American troops and increase "the possibility that the US will take over Israel's illegal occupation of Palestine, potentially bogging us down in the region indefinitely."

The Trump White House has consistently pledged 'no boots on the ground' in Gaza amid the peace deal, but a large US base would certainly be a big step closer to violating that promise. Such mission and scope creep is an unfortunate pattern of US actions in the Mideast, spanning decades.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 16:40

The War That Made The Fed; The Fed That Made The War

The War That Made The Fed; The Fed That Made The War

Authored by Byron King via DailyReckoning.com,

It’s Veterans’ Day, originally called “Armistice Day” to commemorate the end of the Great War (aka World War I) on Nov. 11, 1918.

In this regard, it’s appropriate to discuss the war. And since this is an investment-oriented letter, we’ll address how the U.S. Federal Reserve helped finance it.

Below, we’ll look at how the 1914-18 conflict reshaped America’s system of national finance, and laid foundations that eventually brought us to the current situation of $38 trillion in national debt and $4,000 gold.

Great War recruiting poster. Courtesy Imperial War Museum.

The Central Bank’s War

Most people don’t associate the Fed with World War I, but the institution played a crucial role in the event and I’ll go down that rabbit hole. Here are some historical basics.

Let’s begin on Friday night, December 23, 1913, meaning Christmas Eve weekend when few people (except deep insiders) were paying attention. President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law.

President Wilson signs Federal Reserve Act. Courtesy Federal Reserve History site.

To all intents and purposes this new entity was America’s central bank, although its creators didn’t label it as such due to strong public aversion to the idea. Recall, for example, how in 1832 President Andrew Jackson vetoed a bill that proposed to re-charter the Second Bank of the United States. Long story; not here.

Later, as 1914 unfolded the Fed stood up and began to work within the U.S. government system and of course played a role within the national economy. By design of its promoters, the Fed was intended to oversee a so-called “elastic currency,” not necessarily tethered to a fixed supply of gold in the vaults of America’s banks.

That is, the idea behind the Fed was to avoid monetary disasters like the Panic of 1907, when the federal government literally ran out of cash and had to borrow gold from banker J.P Morgan. The Fed’s mission was to issue credit – aka “create money” in the form of dollars – during tight times and ensure the general liquidity of the American economy.

Banker J.P. Morgan bailed out Uncle Sam after the 1907 Panic. Courtesy Library of Congress.

And who knows? The idea might have worked out well, except for what happened later in 1914, in August to be exact, when Europe went to war on all fronts. The short version is that Austria invaded Serbia; Russia mobilized; Germany mobilized; France mobilized; Britain mobilized; and pretty soon, almost every nation in Europe was fighting, to include combat across the globe from Africa to South America to the South Pacific.

Just a few months later, by about December 1914, pretty much every nation involved in the European fight was at or near technical insolvency. Governments had blown through their respective treasuries and could no longer pay the bills; but since when has that ever stopped a war, right?

Meanwhile, in those few short months, the European war sparked a business revival in the U.S. The short version is that innumerable banks and businesses sold and financed goods to belligerent nations, mostly to Britain, France and other “allied” parties because an Anglo-French naval blockade of Continental Europe kept Germany or Austria from importing too much from the U.S.

Insolvent or not, when Britain and France ran out of cash with which to pay for U.S. goods, they turned to credit markets. And in the U.S., President Wilson was okay with that. He supported American banks and businesses to make sales with credit, and this is also where the Fed comes in because it backed the banks’ issuance of credit.

Plus, under Wilson, the U.S. government went so far as to guarantee many billions of dollars’ worth of British and French bonds. This meant that if investors bought British or French paper, they would be assured of return on their investment if the bonds defaulted.

The takeaway here is that, among its first macroeconomic impacts, the Fed issued credit to enable Britain, France and other nations to buy U.S. materiel. This was inflationary at home in the U.S., and beyond doubt it enabled and prolonged the European war.

War, Bond Markets, and a Global Credit System

This Fed-backed wartime credit system continued to 1917, when the U.S. formally entered the war and began a vast, internal military buildup. Then, the requirements for U.S. government funding immediately skyrocketed, a macroeconomic issue that landed squarely at the front door of the Fed.

In other words, instead of just issuing and guaranteeing credit for Britain, France, etc., the Fed now had to fund a colossal American military effort that included bringing millions of men into the Army and Navy, plus building out a vast array of equipment, munitions and much more.

This U.S. military buildup led to new levels of federal borrowing at a historically unprecedented scale, via a series of what were called “Liberty” loans, and a later “Victory” loan issuance.

The Sine Qua Non of war: men and money. Courtesy U.S. Navy, History & Heritage Command.

In essence, the U.S. government sold Liberty Bonds during the war, and Victory bonds as the war concluded, all to raise money to fund military operations and then meet post-war obligations.

One interesting aside is that in those days before computers and electronic trading, bonds were printed on sturdy paper in fancy script, like this:

U.S. 1918, 25-year Second Liberty Loan, $50 face value @4.25%. Courtesy U.S. Treasury.

Obviously, there’s a $50 bond. And note the “coupons” printed on the same sheet of paper. But also, note the single serial number on the bond and all of the coupons. The idea was that after a period of holding, the bondholder would “clip the coupon” (i.e., literally cut it out with a pair of scissors), take it to a bank, and redeem it for the interest due.

All in all, millions of Americans and many foreigners bought these bonds, and thus was created a global-scale market for U.S. government debt. If there was any pre-war doubt about the idea of the U.S. dollar as a global-scale currency, the Liberty-Victory bonds sealed the deal.

Indeed, this 1910s-era, wartime government finance mechanism became DNA, so to speak, of modern American federal fundraising. World War I and the Fed created those above-noted bond markets that are closed on Veterans’ Day, today. And the pathway from financing the Great War to the current system of deficit spending and national debt is clear; it’s the same mechanism, updated to modern technology, to be sure.

Modern War Is Industrial War

Now, a few more comments on what all that Fed-credit bought, way back in the 1910s. Because the war was about far more than high finance, raising money and bond trading.

First, all of that financial credit to Britain, France and other nations allowed them to raise large armies and navies, send them into battle, and get entire generations of young people killed; and Germany and Austria lost similar, large numbers. Even today, that demographic echo bounces around across Europe if not the world.

Anymore, it’s difficult to envision the scale of manpower (and it was almost entirely men) who went into the armed forces of all belligerent nations; and this certainly includes the U.S. after President Wilson marched the U.S. formally into war in 1917. Obviously, the war distorted the entire scope of the population and labor force within Western nations. And people write long books about this; not here, not today.

Great War recruiting poster for British Army. Courtesy Dominicwinter.co.uk.

In a related macroeconomic impact, the global war required vast amounts of goods and services to equip all of these new armies and navies. And again, American and Fed-backed credit led to immense redirections of capital in economies across the world, and certainly within the U.S. And this was the true industrial origin of the modern military-industrial (and Congressional) complex that relies on large levels of government funding.

Great War poster depicting military and industry. Courtesy Bonhams.com.

For example, during the war U.S. President Wilson essentially nationalized America’s railway system, supposedly to expedite movement of troops, equipment and other supplies. The effect was several years of profound overuse and underinvestment, a situation from which the overall rail industry never really recovered.

Meanwhile, across America the war led to boom-times (excuse the pun) for agriculture and quite a bit of manufacturing, which led to large amounts of excess capacity that fell into disuse when the war ended in November 1918. And this led to a postwar recession, or more accurately a “mini-depression” that carried over to about 1921.

Also of interest, a youngish fellow named Franklin Roosevelt served as Assistant Secretary of the Navy under President Wilson and learned quite a few things about how the U.S. government worked; especially, how to raise a lot of money and spend it in a hurry. More books on these matters, to be sure; but not here.

My goal with this note is simply to point out that it’s Veterans’ Day, remember the Great War, spur a few thoughts about all who fought and sacrificed, and highlight how the Fed played a major role in funding it all.

Indeed, World War I was the war that made the Fed; and in another sense the Fed made the war. We still live with that legacy.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 16:20

US Government Agencies Terminate 67 Wasteful Contracts Worth $1.4 Billion: DOGE

US Government Agencies Terminate 67 Wasteful Contracts Worth $1.4 Billion: DOGE

Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times,

Federal government agencies terminated and descoped 67 wasteful contracts over the past five days, which had a ceiling value of $1.4 billion, while saving $648 million in taxpayer funds, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced in an X post on Nov. 8.

The canceled contracts include “a $54k State Dept. training contract for ‘leader as a coach course’, a $456k USAGM broadcasting contract for ‘24/7 FM broadcast service in hosting, operations, technical, and maintenance support in Juba, South Sudan’, and a $1.3M State Dept. education contract for ‘Botswana MI curriculum,’” the post said.

In another Nov. 8 X post, DOGE praised the cross-agency coordination involved in tackling fraud related to the Small Business Administration’s 8(a) program.

Businesses that partake in the 8(a) program are eligible to receive federal contracting as well as training and technical assistance.

According to DOGE, the General Services Administration has facilitated the nonrenewal or termination of 17 “wasteful” 8(a) contracts, generating a savings of $75.1 million. These contracts were active across four federal agencies—the Department of Agriculture, the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Energy, and the Department of War.

DOGE had responded to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s Nov. 7 X post about the crackdown on fraudulent use of government programs.

“President Trump has directed his administration to eliminate fraud and waste wherever it occurs, ensuring that each taxpayer dollar is spent as intended,” Bessent wrote.

“Treasury will not tolerate fraudulent misuse of federal contracting programs. These initiatives must benefit legitimate small businesses that deliver measurable value to the government and the public.”

Democrats have raised concerns about DOGE’s activities, particularly regarding the data privacy of Americans.

In September, Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) released a report suggesting that DOGE’s activities were likely violating federal privacy and security laws while putting the personal data of millions of Americans at risk, according to a Sept. 25 statement from the lawmaker’s office.

The report was based on investigations done by Peters’s staff and whistleblower statements.

At the Social Security Administration, DOGE employees had access to personal data of all Americans, including their Social Security Numbers (SSNs), the report said, adding that such access was made available in a cloud environment without “any verified security controls.”

One whistleblower noted the possibility that the agency may need to re-issue SSNs to all who possess one. A compromised SSN can be personally devastating. That’s because SSNs are the backbone for accessing all kinds of public and private services, from acquiring a driver’s license to going to the doctor,” the report said.

“Unwinding the harm done by identity thieves can involve years of credit and identity monitoring, mountains of paperwork. If penetrated, this data vulnerability could result in the most significant data breach of Americans’ sensitive data in history.”

Meanwhile, during an Oct. 31 interview with Joe Rogan on his podcast, former DOGE head Elon Musk said the initiative continues to reduce government waste and fraud.

Musk said that since he left DOGE in May, the initiative has become less publicized because people who oppose DOGE now have no single person to target.

“You turn off the money spigot to fraudsters, they get very upset, to say the least,” he said.

“My death threat level went ballistic, you know, was like a rocket going to orbit. But now that I’m not in D.C., I guess they don’t really have a person to attack anymore.”

According to the DOGE website, the initiative has so far saved $214 billion in taxpayer funds as of Oct.4.

This comes to more than $1,329 saved per taxpayer, based on an estimate of 161 million individual federal taxpayers.

The savings were made through a combination of asset sales, interest savings, grant cancellations, minimizing fraud and improper payments, workforce reductions, and regulatory savings.

The Department of Health and Human Services ranks as the top agency that has registered the most savings under DOGE. This was followed by the General Services Administration, the Social Security Administration, the Office of Personnel Management, and the Small Business Administration.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 15:40

'Mark It Zero': BlackRock Hit With Sudden Total Loss On $150 Million Private Loan

'Mark It Zero': BlackRock Hit With Sudden Total Loss On $150 Million Private Loan

Another cockroach crawls out of the woodwork...

In the grand tradition of Wall Street's endless parade of "resilient" investments that evaporate faster than a hedge fund's excuses, BlackRock - that $10 trillion behemoth masquerading as a fiduciary - has just discovered the hard way that private debt isn't quite the "uncorrelated" panacea it's been hawking to pension funds and the terminally optimistic.

Bloomberg reports that a mere month ago, the iShares overlords were marking Renovo Home Partners' IOUs at a pristine 100 cents on the dollar, as if the Dallas-based kitchen-and-bathroom flipper was churning out profits like an OnlyFans 'influencer'.

Fast-forward to last week, and poof: valuation revised to a resounding zero.

Because nothing says "diversification" like watching your balance sheet get torched in a single earnings call.

Renovo, a Frankenstein's monster of a roll-up stitched together by private equity players at Audax Group back in 2022, didn't just stumble - it plunged into Chapter 7 oblivion, signaling a full liquidation shutdown.

Bloomberg notes that while BlackRock, ever the glutton for yield, gobbled up the lion's share of Renovo's $150 million private debt buffet, it was not alone.

Apollo Global's MidCap Financial and Oaktree Capital nibbled at the scraps, per whispers from those in the know who wouldn't dare attach their names to this private equity horror show.

No one with a Bloomberg terminal needed a crystal ball to see the dumpster fire brewing.

Back in April, the lenders - those paragons of patience - took haircuts, swapped loans for equity confetti, and prayed a recap would resurrect the zombie.

By Q3, they even greenlit "payment-in-kind" interest deferrals.

Regulatory filings paint the picture: a desperate bid to keep the lights on while pretending the emperor had clothes.

Yet, as September wrapped, BlackRock and MidCap funds were still polishing their Renovo turds to a par-value shine, signaling to the world (or at least their NAV reports) that full repayment was as inevitable as the Fed's next pivot.

Ah, the magic of private debt mark-to-model - where liquidity is whatever you say it is, until it's not.

Enter Q4: the quarter where illusions go to die.

“Early in the fourth quarter, company-specific performance and liquidity issues led the Renovo board to determine that the best available path forward was a liquidation process,” Philip Tseng, chief executive officer of BlackRock TCP Capital Corp., said during an earnings call. 

Tseng, in a tone-deaf earnings confessional, admitted the inevitable:

"We expect to fully write down this position in the fourth quarter of 2025."

Because nothing screams confidence like pre-announcing a wipeout.

While the Renovo debt represents a mere sliver of total assets for the three lenders, Bloomberg concludes poignantly that its sudden collapse strikes at the heart of what critics see as a major vulnerability in the private credit market: the disconnect between the valuation of illiquid loans and the performance of the underlying companies.

Remember Zips Car Wash? Lenders marked it near-par for months before it imploded earlier this year. Or Tricolor Holdings and First Brands Group, those subprime auto and auto-parts cadavers that blindsided the Street, igniting a blame-game cage match over who peddled the shoddiest underwriting standards.

In private credit's shadow banking circus, where yields are chased like molly at a rave, Renovo's vaporization is less anomaly than canary in the coal mine... and to mix metaphors, we suspect more cockroaches are on their way, and the next one may not be a mere 'fleshwound'.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 15:20

Trump Says US Close To Securing 'Fair Trade Deal' With India

Trump Says US Close To Securing 'Fair Trade Deal' With India

Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times,

President Donald Trump said on Nov. 10 that the United States was “pretty close” to reaching a trade deal with India that would be fair to both sides and indicated that he may lower tariffs on Indian goods.

“We’re making a deal with India, a much different deal than we had in the past,” he told reporters at the Oval Office. “We’re getting a fair deal, just a fair trade deal.”

Trump did not provide further details about the potential trade deal with India but said it would be “good for everybody.”

When asked whether the U.S. government would lower tariffs on imports from India, Trump suggested it is possible “at some point,” noting that India has recently reduced its purchases of Russian oil.

“Well, right now the tariffs are very high on India because of the Russian oil, and they’ve stopped doing the Russian oil,” he said. “It’s been reduced very substantially. Yeah, we’re going to be bringing the tariffs down.”

India currently faces a total U.S. tariff rate of 50 percent, including a 25 percent tariff that Trump imposed in August over the country’s purchases of Russian crude.

Trump made the comments during the swearing-in ceremony of his envoy to India, Sergio Gor, whose role will focus on strengthening U.S.–India ties, promoting investment in key U.S. industries and technology, increasing U.S. energy exports, and expanding security cooperation, the president said.

During a White House press conference last week, Trump hinted that he could visit India next year at the invitation of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

“[Modi] largely stopped buying oil from Russia, and he’s a friend of mine, and we speak, and he wants me to go there. We’ll figure that out, I’ll go,” he said. “Prime Minister Modi is a great man, and I’ll be going.”

The U.S. president has previously warned that his administration would maintain its massive tariffs on imports from India if it continued to buy Russian oil amid Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine.

While Trump had repeatedly said that India has largely reduced its imports of Russian oil, the Indian government has not publicly confirmed any such cutback.

India has become a major market for Russian oil as Russia faces sanctions and export controls from Western nations aimed at pressuring Moscow to end its war in Ukraine, which has been ongoing since 2022.

Before Russia invaded Ukraine, India’s annual crude oil imports from Russia hovered at about $1 billion. Since the war began, imports have skyrocketed, reaching $25.5 billion in 2022, $48.6 billion in 2023, and $52.7 billion in 2024, according to the U.N. Comtrade database.

Trump signaled on Sept. 7 that his administration is ready to move forward with a second phase of sanctions against Russia, as negotiations to end Russia’s war in Ukraine stalled and Moscow intensified its attacks on Kyiv.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 15:00

UK Cuts Intelligence Sharing With US Related To 'Illegal' Venezuela Action

UK Cuts Intelligence Sharing With US Related To 'Illegal' Venezuela Action

Just as the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group entered Caribbean waters on Tuesday, it's been revealed that the United Kingdom has made the unprecedented and provocative move of cutting off intelligence-sharing with the United States related to suspected drug trafficking vessels off Venezuela.

CNN reports Tuesday that Britain cited that it does not want to be complicit in ongoing US military strikes against alleged drug-trafficking boats, as it believes the action is illegal, amounting to extrajudicial killings, also after recent criticisms from United Nations officials. However, it is said to be a cut-off in only "some" intel-sharing.

UK Ministry of Defence

This is of immense importance from one of America's closest allies - and part of the 'Five Eyes' intelligence sharing nations - which has time and again enthusiastically joined in Washington's military adventurism abroad, from Afghanistan to Iraq to Libya and Syria.

The fresh report details the UK's prior role in assisting US agencies in the Caribbean, where Britain has small overseas territories:

For years, the UK, which controls a number of territories in the Caribbean where it bases intelligence assets, has helped the US locate vessels suspected of carrying drugs so that the US Coast Guard could interdict them, the sources said. That meant the ships would be stopped, boarded, its crew detained, and drugs seized.

The intelligence was typically sent to Joint Interagency Task Force South, a task force stationed in Florida that includes representatives from a number of partner nations and works to reduce the illicit drug trade.

The report confirms that the intelligence has actually been paused for over a month, which would have been soon after the Pentagon began attacking small boats off Latin America in September.

There is an irony in London suddenly discovering the moral high ground on the issue of Venezuela, given that for years the government has frozen more than $1.8bn worth of Venezuelan gold stored at the Bank of England. The Maduro government has sued to get it back, denouncing the move as brazen theft.

It could be that UK leaders sense that Trump is serious about pressing regime change in Caracas, and doesn't want to be a direct part of it. Indeed the unprecedented numbers of US warships currently parked in SOUTHCOM waters does strongly point to imminent military action.

But clearly London is now saying it will sit on the sidelines on this particular military adventure in America's backyard. At this point some 76 alleged drug-smugglers have been killed, and 19 boats destroyed, in the Trump-ordered Pentagon action.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 14:40

MSU Under Fire For Radical Teacher Training Materials On Race And Capitalism

MSU Under Fire For Radical Teacher Training Materials On Race And Capitalism

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

Michigan State University’s College of Education is under scrutiny for its radical training materials for teachers as part of its program, “Social Foundations of Justice and Equity in Education.” The material includes radical race theories and a video of Communist and Black Panther Angela Davis explaining that “racism is integrally linked to capitalism.”

The Federalist reported on the material, which includes a warning to educators that those “who cling to their Whiteness cannot participate in abolitionist teaching because they are a distraction, are unproductive, and will undermine freedom at every step, sometimes in the name of social justice.”

Imagine if material told black or other minority teachers that they had to drop identities to their race if they want to teach. “Clinging to your Whiteness” is often a complaint leveled against those who do not repeat race-based mantras or statements in these sessions. Such public demonstrations have long been a part of the academic orthodoxy. Years ago, I noted with concern how academics were expected to engage in public confessions like the one at Northwestern University School of Law when Northwestern Law Dean declared publicly, “I am James Speta and I am a racist.” He was followed by Emily Mullin, executive director of major gifts, who said, “I am a racist and a gatekeeper of white supremacy. I will work to be better.”

MSU requires teachers to listen to Davis make the absurd claim that capitalism is inherently racist. Another video claims that “America can never be a meritocracy” without fundamental changes to create an “equal starting point and equal resources.” 

Telling teachers that they cannot succeed unless they give up their racial identity can be an environment of extreme intolerance and orthodoxy. It is one thing to address racism (in all forms) and singling out white teachers as having to address their race. Some students may assume that public demonstrations or affirmations are required to counter assumptions about their bias or inherent racism.

As for the use of Davis to claim that capitalism is the driver of racism, it ignores how capitalism fuels the advancement and empowerment of citizens. There is nothing inherently racist about a system emphasizing individual productivity and success. My Sicilian grandparents faced prejudices and extreme poverty in arriving in our country. They soon found that hard work allowed them to secure a better life for themselves and their children.

While she later left the party over internal disputes, Davis previously declared:

“I am a Communist because … If we are going to rise out of our oppression, our poverty, if we are going to cease being the targets of the racist-minded mentality of racist policemen, we will have to destroy the American capitalist system. We will have to obliterate a system in which a few wealthy capitalists are guaranteed the privilege of becoming richer and richer, whereas the people who are forced to work for the rich, and especially Black people, never take any significant step forward.”

I actually think that Davis’s views on capitalism and racism would be valuable in a course on those subjects to explore different views on such subjects. The question is why MSU would select Davis to be part of the mandatory material for new teachers as part of an education training and whether there is true balance offered in the material from figures like Milton Friedman or others on the benefits of capitalism. That does not appear to be the case at MSU.

MSU should address these concerns and show how, if such material is included in required reading, there is also material that offers real balance and counterpoints to these radical views.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 13:40

Syria Signs Declaration To Join US-Led Coalition To Defeat ISIS Terrorist Group

Syria Signs Declaration To Join US-Led Coalition To Defeat ISIS Terrorist Group

Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times,

Syria has agreed to join the U.S.-led coalition to tackle the ISIS terrorist group following a meeting between President Ahmed al-Sharaa and U.S. President Donald Trump on Nov. 10, according to a Syrian official.

Syrian Information Minister Hamza al-Mustafa said on Nov. 10 that Syria has signed “a political cooperation declaration” with the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS—a coalition signed by 89 other partners to combat ISIS in Iraq, Syria, and globally—confirming its commitment to efforts to combat terrorism and support regional stability.

“The agreement is political and until now contains no military components,” al-Mustafa said in a statement posted to X.

A senior U.S. administration official also confirmed to The Epoch Times that Syria will join the international coalition.

Al-Sharaa’s meeting with Trump at the White House on Nov. 10 was the first visit by a Syrian leader since the country gained independence from France in 1946.

Al-Mustafa said the talks centered on expanding economic cooperation between the two nations, U.S. investments, and easing sanctions imposed under the Caesar Act—which bars the sale of U.S. goods and technology to Syria and blocks the country from the international banking system.

The two leaders also discussed plans to integrate the Syrian Democratic Forces into the Syrian Army, al-Mustafa stated, noting that the move aims to “unify institutions and ensure lasting stability” in the region.

The meeting resulted in Trump granting a 180-day extension of his waiver of sanctions against Syria. Trump told reporters Nov. 10 that he wants to see Syria “become a country that’s very successful.”

In an interview with Fox News that aired Nov. 10, al-Sharaa said Syria has entered “a new era” in its relations with the United States after the fall of the Assad regime, emphasizing Damascus’s intention to establish itself as a geopolitical partner.

“The goal is for Syria to no longer be seen as a security threat but as a geopolitical ally and a country where the U.S. can invest significantly, especially in gas extraction,” he said, according to a translation from Syria’s state media.

When asked about Syria’s participation in the coalition against ISIS, al-Sharaa acknowledged the reasons for the U.S. military presence in Syria but said that it should now be coordinated with the Syrian government.

“We need to discuss these issues and reach an agreement regarding ISIS,” he stated.

Al-Sharaa took office in December 2024 after former leader Bashar al-Assad fled to Moscow, ending his family’s 53-year rule in Syria. Al-Sharaa led the Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which claimed victory in the country’s 13-year civil war.

HTS, which has roots in the Islamist terrorist group al-Qaeda, was designated a foreign terrorist organization by the State Department in 2018 but was removed from the list this year.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 13:00

Flight Cancellations Climb To 6% As Washington Edges Closer To Ending Record Shutdown

Flight Cancellations Climb To 6% As Washington Edges Closer To Ending Record Shutdown

Airlines are set to cancel 6% of flights at 40 major U.S. airports today under the FAA's mandated reductions linked to the longest-ever federal government shutdown, even as the Senate passed a bipartisan deal - now awaiting a House vote for final passage before arriving on President Trump's desk. 

The eight Democrats who broke ranks late Monday to support the bill likely did so after realizing that the FAA's planned wave of flight cancellations threatened to paralyze the nation's busiest airports in the coming weeks, with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy warning that flight reductions could soon exceed 20%. 

As of 11:00 ET, 1,528 flights were delayed and 1,201 were canceled, with United Airlines publishing a nationwide list of cancellations through Wednesday. Major airports in New York, Chicago, Atlanta, Denver, Boston, Charlotte, and Dallas are among the hardest hit. 

The FAA intends to ramp up flight cancellations this week to ease pressure on air traffic controllers and TSA staff, many of whom have now gone 42 days without pay. The agency's plan calls for cancellations to rise to 8% on Thursday and 10% by Friday if lawmakers fail to resolve the shutdown. 

Related:

Polymarket odds now show a 95% probability that the government will reopen by Saturday, suggesting relief may be imminent.

On Monday, President Trump wrote on X, urging "All Air Traffic Controllers must get back to work, NOW!!!" threatening that "Anyone who doesn't will be substantially "docked.""

Furthermore, he offered 'patriotic' controllers, who did not skip work, a sizable bonus: 

"For those Air Traffic Controllers who who were GREAT PATRIOTS, and didn't take ANY TIME OFF for the "Democrat Shutdown Hoax," I will be recommending a BONUS of $10,000 per person for distinguished service to our Country."

On Sunday, before there was any news of moderate Democrats crossing the aisle to back the GOP bill to reopen the government, we outlined:

Duffy's warning that flight cancellations could surge to 20% likely jolted Dems to the negotiating table, as the prospect of nationwide travel chaos during the busiest travel period of the year threatened to infuriate tens of millions of voters.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 12:40

PA Election Results Signal Danger For The GOP in 2026

PA Election Results Signal Danger For The GOP in 2026

Authored by John Hinshaw via RealClearPennsylvania,

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is pretty evenly divided, so why did voters send such a lopsided signal?

In terms of voter registration, Pennsylvanians divide their loyalty between the Republican and Democratic parties.  Yet more than 60% of voters supported the retention of Democratic Supreme Court justices. 

Decennial off-year elections for judges are notoriously quirky things, and only one justice has lost a retention election since 1968.  And as the GOP’s base has become less country club and more country, Democrats hold an edge in more educated voters, who reliably vote even in municipal elections.

However, this was not a particularly low-turnout election. About 40% of the electorate showed up, or about two thirds more than in 2015, when these justices were first elected. This reflects the large amounts of money that Republican and Democratic groups spent to raise awareness and to encourage participation.

Moreover, in two judicial elections where a Republican faced a Democrat, Democrats won around 56% of the vote. Other down ballot elections tell a similar story of a blue wave.  Democrats swept control over the Luzerne County Council. In Allegheny County, Republicans lost all but eleven elections they contested. School board elections in suburban Philadelphia likewise saw a Democratic sweep.

The elections signal the erosion of once-stalwart Republican strongholds, such as Lancaster County. In 2015, Democrats won just under 36% of the vote in that year’s judicial election. In 2025, that figure was 48%. Likewise, Democrats increased their share of the electorate from 45% to 62% of the vote. In more rural counties, like Perry or Juniata, Republicans held onto voters. The problem is that increasingly voters are living in Southern or Eastern counties that more closely resemble counties like Lancaster or Chester than Perry or Juniata.

Democrats were energized by the Trump presidency for a host of reasons that you can imagine for yourselves. Likewise, Republican voters were not particularly energized, if for no other reason than President Trump was not on the ballot.

*  *  *
Please consider supporting ZeroHedge with the purchase of a hat or a multitool...

Waxed Canvas Hat

Multitool

*  *  *

Of course, one swallow does not make a summer, but if this is the electorate that shows up in 2026, Republicans would likely lose some vulnerable seats in the House of Representatives (like Mackenzie and Perry) and likely control over that body. Republicans certainly hope that the economy improves for everyday voters by the midterms and are downplaying these election results.

In our era of nationalized elections, local elections are reasonably good indications of how, and who, will show up to vote. So, let’s glean what we can from the races in Virginia, New Jersey, and Georgia.

Until Tuesday, Republicans had high hopes that they were assembling a diverse working-class coalition. In 2024, significant numbers of working-class Latinos and African Americans voted for Trump. That support evaporated on Tuesday. 

In Virginia, Republicans lost whatever ground the GOP had gained with Black, Hispanic, and Asian voters.  The spread between the 2024 and 2025 races indicate a loss of 20% of the vote share of Latino voters, 11% of Blacks, 42% of Asian Americans, and 17% of those with incomes under $100,000. This is why Abigail Spanberger won, and Democrats picked up 13 seats in the House of Burgesses. The shift in Latino voters was also evident in New Jersey. In Union City, a city that is more than 80% Latino, more supported Sherill than had voted for Kamala Harris last year. 

Georgia also had elections on Tuesday, and Democrats won their first state-wide elections since 2006, flipping two seats on the Public Services Commission.  This was a low turnout election, with about 20-30% of the rate of the last presidential race.  (Morris breaks down figures by county).  Morris observes a consistent shift in Democratic vote share, consistent with the new reality that Democratic voters tend to show up for off-year elections more so than Republican voters.

But Virginia and New Jersey’s elections were not low turnout affairs. There, turnout was about 65-80% of the size of 2024 presidential election. There, the same pattern emerges of a strong shift toward Democrats. 

Exit polls showed that around two thirds of voters concerned about the economy voted for Democratic governors. In 2024, Trump won 81% of those voters. That’s a 93% shift in voter sentiment on that issue and should be a klaxon for Republican elected officials. These election results indicate that Democrats are overperforming their 2024 baseline by 8% points. That’s a strong indication of a blue wave like in 2018.

It’s quite possible that the electorate’s mood will sour more by 2026. Today, voters are dealing with higher prices, which they hate, and levels of economic pessimism are growing due to tariffs, the threat of AI on jobs, etc. The labor market is not booming, but we have not yet experienced the kinds of layoffs that typically accompany recessions.  Last Tuesday voters were worried about rising costs of health insurance, or the possibility of hospital closures; by 2026, those will be realities they are living with. 

It's likely that the government shut down had raised the profile of the cuts to health care subsidies, or Medicaid, or SNAP, and that voters’ anxiety or anger about that has peaked.  Perhaps forces will shift voters’ attentions to culture war issues.

If not, or if the economy deteriorates further, voters’ moods would darken further and likely take it out on the party in control of government. In this election cycle, Democrats came close to winning the partisan judicial races in ruby red counties like Washington (where Trump won 63% of the vote), or Adams, where Trump won 66% of the vote. In that scenario, Republicans would likely lose control over the state Senate.

Buckle up, we’re in for a heck of a ride.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 12:25

Clock Ticking On Looming Anti-Maduro Action As Ford Carrier Group Has Arrived

Clock Ticking On Looming Anti-Maduro Action As Ford Carrier Group Has Arrived

The USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier strike group has finally arrived in the US Southern Command Area of Responsibility, after late last month President Trump ordered it to Caribbean waters from its deployment in the Mediterranean.

This represents a drastically-stepped up campaign with an eye on Venezuela, at a moment Washington is mulling possible regime change targeting President Nicolás Maduro, with US officials describing the Ford carrier's purpose as to bolster the Navy's capacity to detect, monitor, and disrupt illicit actors and activities.

US Navy Image

It also comes after weeks of drones strikes taking out alleged drug smuggling boats - and the tally now stands at nineteen vessels destroyed and over 70 killed.

The Ford and its current three accompanying warships sailed through the Strait of Gibraltar on Nov. 4. "Ship spotters detected Ford escort, USS Bainbridge (DDG-96) off the coast of Puerto Rico early Tuesday. Bainbridge sailed with Ford through Gibraltar," naval publications note Tuesday. Additionally, Navy.mil announces Tuesday:

The maritime forces’ arrival comes after Secretary of War Pete Hegseth directed the Carrier Strike Group to support the President’s directive to dismantle Transnational Criminal Organizations and counter narco-terrorism in defense of the Homeland.

Previously, the Washington-based Center for Strategic & International Studies laid out why an entire carrier group in Caribbean waters represents a "use it or lose it" scenario which is ultra-costly, also in terms of removing it from other parts of the world:

Moving such a major element of U.S. combat power is highly significant because of the strategic trade-off it represents. The Navy has only 11 aircraft carriers. In general, only three are at sea at any one time because of the need for maintenance and training. All the regional commanders want them. U.S. Indo-Pacific Command always wants one—as a supplement to the carrier permanently stationed in Japan to counter the Chinese navy and conduct exercises with regional allies and partners.

Central Command wants one for the Indian Ocean for use against Iran and the Houthis or in the Eastern Mediterranean to provide air defense for Israel. European Command wants one for operations around Europe to deter Russia. By contrast, the Caribbean has been a low-visibility region for decades, with carriers rarely visiting.

Of course, all of this represents something likely much more than just a renewed 'war on drugs' - after Trump already said that potential land strikes against cartels in Venezuela are on the table.

The CSIS report also hinted that the scope is likely far beyond blasting a few drug boats out of the water:

Carriers are immensely powerful because of their air wing. Their striking power comes primarily from the fighter/attack aircraft, typically 24 F/A-18E/Fs and 24 F-35Cs. However, these aircraft are not well suited for counterdrug search because they move too fast. In addition to the fighters, carriers have support aircraft like E-2Ds for aerial surveillance (four, typically) and SH-60R/S helicopters (19) for antisubmarine warfare. The helicopters could help with search and can fire antiship missiles, like Penguins, which are designed to attack fast boats.

There's also the immense numbers of missiles which can now be trained on Venezuela, as CSIS further documents: "With the addition of these three ships, U.S. naval forces in the region will have over 700 Vertical Launch System (VLS) cells."

The report continues: "Those launchers carry a variety of missiles, including Tomahawk missiles for land attack, SM-2/SM-6 missiles for air defense, and SM-3 for ballistic missile defense. With an average loadout across the force of 25 percent land attack missiles, roughly 180 Tomahawks would be available for strikes against the Maduro regime or cartel facilities."

With this level of Pentagon assets parked in one SOUTHCOM region, which is unprecedented in recent history, the "clock is ticking" - as The Economist has highlighted.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 12:05

Supreme Court Takes Up Case On Whether Ballots Must Arrive By Election Day

Supreme Court Takes Up Case On Whether Ballots Must Arrive By Election Day

Authored by Matthew Vadum via The Epoch Times,

The U.S. Supreme Court decided on Nov. 10 to consider a challenge to a federal law that blocks states from counting mail-in ballots that officials receive after Election Day.

The court granted the petition in Watson v. Republican National Committee in an unsigned order on Nov. 10. No justices dissented.

The Republican National Committee, the state Republican Party, and the state’s Libertarian Party sued over the law.

Eighteen states accept mailed ballots received after Election Day if they bear a postmark from on or before Election Day, according to a National Conference of State Legislatures report.

​​Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson filed the petition with the Supreme Court in June.

Federal election law sets the Tuesday after the first Monday in November every four years as “the ‘election’ day for federal offices,” the petition said.

Mississippi law requires that ballots for federal offices have to be marked and filed with election officials by that day, but also permits ballots to be counted if election officials received them within five business days after Election Day.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the federal law requiring ballots to be cast and received by election officials by Election Day preempts—or prevails over—Mississippi law.

The Fifth Circuit’s decision “defies statutory text, conflicts with this Court’s precedent, and—if left to stand—will have destabilizing nationwide ramifications.” Five circuit judges said in dissent from a denial of rehearing that the ruling is “deeply wrong and raises an issue of exceptional importance,” the petition said.

In a related case, the Supreme Court seemed receptive on Oct. 8 to a Republican congressman’s argument that he should be allowed to challenge an Illinois law that allows the counting of ballots for two weeks after Election Day.

Arguments in the case, known as Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, focused on the question of legal standing, as opposed to the merits of the lawsuit contesting the Illinois statute.

Standing refers to the right of someone to sue in court. A party must show a strong enough connection to the claim to justify participating in a lawsuit.

If the lawmaker wins at the high court, his stalled lawsuit would be reinstated and would continue its journey in the lower courts.

The oral argument in the case has not yet been scheduled, but is likely to take place early in 2026.

A ruling would likely come by the end of June 2026, in time for the mid-term elections.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 11:50

Islamabad Court Bombing Kills 12 - Pakistan Quickly Blames India, Afghanistan

Islamabad Court Bombing Kills 12 - Pakistan Quickly Blames India, Afghanistan

A suicide bombing attack outside a court in Pakistan's capital Islamabad has killed 12 people and injured at least 27 more, and by all reports the carnage could have been worse as the attacker was unable to get inside a district courthouse, the intended target.

Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari has said he "strongly condemned the suicide blast." And Sindh province’s Home Minister Ziaul Hassan Lanjar said in a statement, "Suicide bombers and terrorists have no religion. They are enemies of humanity."

Aftermath of the attack Tuesday, AFP/Getty Images

"As I entered the court building, a huge blast occurred. I thought the entire judiciary building would collapse on me," a court lawyer and eyewitness, Zahid Khan, told CBS News. "When I went upstairs, I saw people lying on the ground around the fire … Just three minutes earlier, I had been at that exact spot while parking my bike."

"I saw many people lying injured, with blood on the road," he said. Smoke had still been visible rising over the area in the wake of the blast.

Importantly Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has quickly laid blame on India, despite suicide bombings not being typical of operations out of India:

Sharif has blamed India for the “suicide attack” in Islamabad as well as the attack on a cadet college that took place near the border with Afghanistan earlier today.

Without providing any evidence to back up his statement, Sharif said: "Both attacks are the worst examples of Indian state terrorism in the region."

"It is time for the world to condemn such nefarious conspiracies of India," he continued in an official government account post on X. "We will continue the war against them until the complete elimination of the scourge of terrorism."

Casting stones at India is typical of rival nuclear-armed power Pakistan, as the neighboring countries have long been bitter enemies, but the past week has seen the Pakistani Taliban, or TTP, as well as some representatives within the Afghan Taliban issue repeat threats against Pakistani cities.

Pakistan's Minister of Defense Khawaja Asif did narrow his blame on Afghan and border terrorism. "Kabul's rulers can stop terrorism in Pakistan, but today's suicide attack at the Islamabad district courts proves this is a nationwide war," Asif said in a statement Tuesday.

"Anyone who believes the Pakistan Army is only fighting on the Afghan-Pakistan border and in remote Balochistan should take this attack as a wake-up call. This is a war for all of Pakistan," he added.

The timing of this attack is interesting related to India, however, as just the day prior a large car blast targeted Red Fort, which is a highly populated tourist destination. It killed eight and wounded many more, after which India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi vowed that the "conspirators" behind the blast "will not be spared," and that "all those responsible will be brought to justice."

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/11/2025 - 11:20

Pages